315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2021852)
1. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses.
Fok M; Ah-Chong AK; Cheng SW; Wong J
Br J Surg; 1991 Mar; 78(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 2021852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses.
Beitler AL; Urschel JD
Am J Surg; 1998 Apr; 175(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 9568667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
Blackmon SH; Correa AM; Wynn B; Hofstetter WL; Martin LW; Mehran RJ; Rice DC; Swisher SG; Walsh GL; Roth JA; Vaporciyan AA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Law S; Fok M; Chu KM; Wong J
Ann Surg; 1997 Aug; 226(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 9296510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.
Lam TC; Fok M; Cheng SW; Wong J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Aug; 104(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 1495302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sutures, staplers, leaks and strictures. A review of anastomoses in oesophageal resection at Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast 1977-1986.
McManus KG; Ritchie AJ; McGuigan J; Stevenson HM; Gibbons JR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1990; 4(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 2184859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
Takeyoshi I; Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawashima Y; Ohya T; Kawate S; Arai K; Nakasone Y; Morishita Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of 5-mm Laparoscopic Stapler to Perform Open Small Bowel Anastomosis in a Neonatal Animal Model.
Glenn IC; Bruns NE; Ponsky TA
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Oct; 26(10):840-844. PubMed ID: 27462959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.
Saluja SS; Ray S; Pal S; Sanyal S; Agrawal N; Dash NR; Sahni P; Chattopadhyay TK
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Jul; 16(7):1287-95. PubMed ID: 22528571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Experiences with 216 manual esophageal anastomoses and with mechanical single and double row suture technique (SPTU, EEA, ILS) in stomach cancers].
Damanakis K; Kantartzis M; Schenk R; Wissenberg V
Zentralbl Chir; 1992; 117(11):583-8. PubMed ID: 1471444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome.
Behzadi A; Nichols FC; Cassivi SD; Deschamps C; Allen MS; Pairolero PC
J Gastrointest Surg; 2005 Nov; 9(8):1031-40; discussion 1040-2. PubMed ID: 16269373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A single-layer, continuous, hand-sewn method for esophageal anastomosis: prospective evaluation in 218 patients.
Law S; Suen DT; Wong KH; Kwok KF; Wong J
Arch Surg; 2005 Jan; 140(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15655203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
