121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20218892)
1. Validation of virtual reality simulation for percutaneous renal access training.
Mishra S; Kurien A; Patel R; Patil P; Ganpule A; Muthu V; Sabnis RB; Desai M
J Endourol; 2010 Apr; 24(4):635-40. PubMed ID: 20218892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized, controlled, prospective study validating the acquisition of percutaneous renal collecting system access skills using a computer based hybrid virtual reality surgical simulator: phase I.
Knudsen BE; Matsumoto ED; Chew BH; Johnson B; Margulis V; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS; Pautler SE; Denstedt JD
J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):2173-8. PubMed ID: 17070287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Training for percutaneous renal access on a virtual reality simulator.
Zhang Y; Yu CF; Liu JS; Wang G; Zhu H; Na YQ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(8):1528-31. PubMed ID: 23595389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous renal access training: content validation comparison between a live porcine and a virtual reality (VR) simulation model.
Mishra S; Kurien A; Ganpule A; Muthu V; Sabnis R; Desai M
BJU Int; 2010 Dec; 106(11):1753-6. PubMed ID: 20950308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a virtual reality simulator to improve percutaneous renal access skills: a prospective study in urology trainees.
Papatsoris AG; Shaikh T; Patel D; Bourdoumis A; Bach C; Buchholz N; Masood J; Junaid I
Urol Int; 2012; 89(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 22777170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation for Percutaneous Renal Access: Where Are We?
Noureldin YA; Andonian S
J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(S1):S10-S19. PubMed ID: 27617641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator.
Hung AJ; Zehnder P; Patil MB; Cai J; Ng CK; Aron M; Gill IS; Desai MM
J Urol; 2011 Sep; 186(3):1019-24. PubMed ID: 21784469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Face, content, construct and concurrent validity of dry laboratory exercises for robotic training using a global assessment tool.
Ramos P; Montez J; Tripp A; Ng CK; Gill IS; Hung AJ
BJU Int; 2014 May; 113(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 24224500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a novel non-biological bench model for the training of percutaneous renal access.
Zhang Y; Yu CF; Jin SH; Li NC; Na YQ
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 24642154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy.
Hung AJ; Shah SH; Dalag L; Shin D; Gill IS
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 25801765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the RobotiX Mentor Robotic Surgery Simulator.
Whittaker G; Aydin A; Raison N; Kum F; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Ahmed K
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 26576836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery.
Kenney PA; Wszolek MF; Gould JJ; Libertino JA; Moinzadeh A
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1288-92. PubMed ID: 19362352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Face and construct validity of a computer-based virtual reality simulator for ERCP.
Bittner JG; Mellinger JD; Imam T; Schade RR; Macfadyen BV
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Feb; 71(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 19922914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy.
Koch AD; Buzink SN; Heemskerk J; Botden SM; Veenendaal R; Jakimowicz JJ; Schoon EJ
Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 17516114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill.
Lin Y; Wang X; Wu F; Chen X; Wang C; Shen G
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Apr; 48():122-9. PubMed ID: 24380817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator.
Wilhelm DM; Ogan K; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS
J Am Coll Surg; 2002 Nov; 195(5):675-81. PubMed ID: 12437255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Tube 3 module designed for practicing vesicourethral anastomosis in a virtual reality robotic simulator: determination of face, content, and construct validity.
Kang SG; Cho S; Kang SH; Haidar AM; Samavedi S; Palmer KJ; Patel VR; Cheon J
Urology; 2014 Aug; 84(2):345-50. PubMed ID: 24975707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Augmented reality simulator for ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal access.
Mu Y; Hocking D; Wang ZT; Garvin GJ; Eagleson R; Peters TM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 May; 15(5):749-757. PubMed ID: 32314227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Face validity, construct validity and training benefits of a virtual reality TURP simulator.
Bright E; Vine S; Wilson MR; Masters RS; McGrath JS
Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 22366646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Simulation-Based Training Curriculum and Validation.
Kuronen-Stewart C; Ahmed K; Aydin A; Cynk M; Miller P; Challacombe B; Khan MS; Dasgupta P; Aho TF; Popert R
Urology; 2015 Sep; 86(3):639-46. PubMed ID: 26126694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
