178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20219574)
1. Comparative evaluation of rotary ProTaper, Profile, and conventional stepback technique on reduction in Enterococcus faecalis colony-forming units and vertical root fracture resistance of root canals.
Singla M; Aggarwal V; Logani A; Shah N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e105-10. PubMed ID: 20219574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal by three instrumentation techniques.
Siqueira JF; Lima KC; Magalhães FA; Lopes HP; de Uzeda M
J Endod; 1999 May; 25(5):332-5. PubMed ID: 10530256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of three instrumentation techniques on the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from a root canal: an in vitro study.
Colak M; Evcil S; Bayindir YZ; Yigit N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Feb; 6(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 15719081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro antimicrobial activity of 0.5%, 1%, and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal system.
Câmara AC; de Albuquerque MM; Aguiar CM; de Barros Correia AC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e55-61. PubMed ID: 19615646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques.
Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE
Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bacterial reduction by extensive versus conservative root canal instrumentation in vitro.
Aydin C; Tunca YM; Senses Z; Baysallar M; Kayaoglu G; Ørstavik D
Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Jun; 65(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 17514519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two rotary systems in root canal preparation regarding disinfection.
Machado ME; Sapia LA; Cai S; Martins GH; Nabeshima CK
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1238-40. PubMed ID: 20630307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of three rotary systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal.
Gorduysus M; Nagas E; Torun OY; Gorduysus O
Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 22117720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of endodontic instrument taper on post retention.
Pettiette MT; Phillips C; Trope M
J Endod; 2003 Jan; 29(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 12540225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bacterial reduction in straight and curved canals using erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser treatment versus a traditional irrigation technique with sodium hypochlorite.
Dewsnup N; Pileggi R; Haddix J; Nair U; Walker C; Varella CH
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):725-8. PubMed ID: 20307752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
Mohammadi Z
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Centring ability and apical transportation after overinstrumentation with ProTaper Universal and ProFile Vortex instruments.
González Sánchez JA; Duran-Sindreu F; de Noé S; Mercadé M; Roig M
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):542-51. PubMed ID: 22264187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots.
Zandbiglari T; Davids H; Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jan; 101(1):126-31. PubMed ID: 16360617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of three instrumentation systems to remove Enterococcus faecalis from root canals.
Matos Neto M; Santos SS; Leão MV; Habitante SM; Rodrigues JR; Jorge AO
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):435-8. PubMed ID: 22211829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of the self-adjusting file system on cleaning and shaping oval canals: a microbiological and microscopic evaluation.
Paranjpe A; de Gregorio C; Gonzalez AM; Gomez A; Silva Herzog D; Piña AA; Cohenca N
J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 22244642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.
Kuştarci A; Akpinar KE; Sümer Z; Er K; Bek B
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19133095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of mandibular premolars and canines with respect to their resistance to vertical root fracture.
Wu MK; van der Sluis LW; Wesselink PR
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 15053908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study.
Pataky L; Iványi I; Grigár A; Fazekas A
J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):603-5. PubMed ID: 12184424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
