122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20220870)
1. [Physician as expert].
Markestad T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(4):408. PubMed ID: 20220870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Is the insurance physician wiser than the treating physician?].
Juntunen J; Havu T
Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2453-5. PubMed ID: 12053338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Expert physicians are important in insurance claim processing. Medical assessment is the basis for correct compensation].
Lysell E
Lakartidningen; 1996 Feb; 93(7):589-92. PubMed ID: 8642922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Non-biased expert?].
Ødegaard S
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Apr; 130(7):722. PubMed ID: 20379328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Expert physicians provide medical assessments but not decisions].
Nilssonne U
Lakartidningen; 2002 Oct; 99(41):4080. PubMed ID: 12451952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The physician as expert witness. Aspects of an ambivalent role exemplified by expert testimony for legal health insurance].
Nüchtern E
Kinderarztl Prax; 1993 Jun; 61(4-5):174-80. PubMed ID: 8361149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Should physicians employed by the insurance authority be considered as physicians or as "medical advisors"?].
Johansson BH
Lakartidningen; 2002 Mar; 99(10):1109. PubMed ID: 12024796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The physician as expert evaluator. Aspects of an ambivalent role exemplified by the evaluation of claims in legal health insurance].
Nüchtern E
Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1990 Jan; 53(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2150544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The physician--a bureaucrat? An aspect of the physician's role as an expert of the insurance system].
Hvinden B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 May; 114(12):1451-4. PubMed ID: 8079236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Assessment of the causes of (occupational) diseases--what do physicians have to say?].
Wergeland E; Bjerkedal T; Mowé G
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Jan; 117(2):248-50. PubMed ID: 9064842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Louisiana physician as witness.
Taylor CO; Marks HW; David RJ; Marcel SW; Cenac CE; ;
J La State Med Soc; 2010; 162(4):231-2, 234-5. PubMed ID: 20882818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A comment to a TV program about activities of medical experts].
Tullberg T
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jun; 99(24):2778-9. PubMed ID: 12101609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Serious factual errors in the TV show "Kalla fakta"].
Tullberg T
Lakartidningen; 2002 Aug; 99(32-33):3226. PubMed ID: 12219480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The forensic psychiatrist: consultant versus activist in legal doctrine.
Diamond BL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 1633333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Taming the expert: standards and implications of radiologist expert witness testimony.
Muroff JA; Berlin L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 17411847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The treating physician and the insurance physician against each other?].
Järvimäki V; Haanpää M
Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2457-8. PubMed ID: 12053339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Courts let UR firms off the nook--and leave doctors on.
Azebedo D
Med Econ; 1993 Jan; 70(2):30-33, 37, 40 passim. PubMed ID: 10123617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Physician's statement concerning whiplash injuries. Significance of supplementary information].
Michler RP; Bovim G; Schrader H
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Mar; 113(9):1104-6. PubMed ID: 7755660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical necessity: who cares, who decides?
Smoak RD
Healthplan; 1999; 40(4):19-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10557733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Expert statement and assessment of medical impairment in work-related pulmonary disease].
Kongerud J; Myhre KI; Hauge OA; Kjuus H; Melbostad E; Aasen TB
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Feb; 116(6):759-63. PubMed ID: 8644083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
