These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20221218)

  • 1. [Studies to evaluate the validity of a diagnostic test: systematic revision and meta-analysis].
    Zamora Vivente J; Plana MN; Abraira Santos V
    Nefrologia; 2009; 29(6 Suppl):15-20. PubMed ID: 20221218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.
    Halligan S
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep; 60(9):977-9. PubMed ID: 16124979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.
    Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Heisterkamp SH
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1525-37. PubMed ID: 12111918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to read a nephrology systematic review.
    Palmer SC; Navaneethan SD; Strippoli GF
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Mar; 15(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20470273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An overview of meta-analyses of diagnostic tests in infectious diseases.
    Cruciani M; Mengoli C
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):225-67, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19393907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Insufficient studies of diagnostic cancer tests. Neither systematic review nor original studies come up to expectations].
    Holmberg L
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Apr 25-May 1; 104(17):1308-9. PubMed ID: 17547275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Meta-analysis: the science of review in Neurology].
    Allam MF; Del Castillo AS; Navajas RF
    Rev Neurol; 2005 Feb 16-28; 40(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 15765317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis under the spotlight: focused on a meta-analysis of ventilator weaning.
    Tobin MJ; Jubran A
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Jan; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18007269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Akobeng AK
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Aug; 90(8):845-8. PubMed ID: 16040886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Hughes EG
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 8796939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gynaecologists blaze the trail in primary studies and systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Johnson NP; Khan KS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Feb; 49(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 19281584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?
    Colliver JA; Kucera K; Verhulst SJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 42(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18715482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Meta-analysis: the art of the systematic overview].
    Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ; Boers M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Aug; 137(32):1594-9. PubMed ID: 8366959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Schlesselman JJ; Collins JA
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 12806564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More than the sum of its parts: meta-analysis and its potential to discover sources of heterogeneity in psychosomatic medicine.
    Tak LM; Meijer A; Manoharan A; de Jonge P; Rosmalen JG
    Psychosom Med; 2010 Apr; 72(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 20395625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
    Fernández Pérez C
    Neurologia; 2003 Mar; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 12610756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.
    Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM
    Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.