These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2022259)
1. Reproductive outcome after unilateral tubocornual anastomosis and contralateral salpingostomy by microsurgery. McComb PF; Lee NH; Stephenson MD Fertil Steril; 1991 May; 55(5):1011-3. PubMed ID: 2022259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Microsurgical tubocornual anastomosis in the treatment of sterility due to obstruction in the proximal part of the ovarian duct]. Tomazevic T; Andelić L Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1986; 26(5-6):115-8. PubMed ID: 3657275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases. Singhal V; Li TC; Cooke ID Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):628-36. PubMed ID: 1883785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The management of female infertility by tubal microsurgical reconstruction: a ten year review. Teoh TG; Kondaveeti U; Darling MR Ir J Med Sci; 1995; 164(3):212-4. PubMed ID: 7672937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximal tubal occlusion: is there an alternative to microsurgery? Dubuisson JB; Chapron C; Ansquer Y; Vacher-Lavenu MC Hum Reprod; 1997 Apr; 12(4):692-8. PubMed ID: 9159426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Microsurgical therapy in tubal sterility]. Fritzsche H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(21):1325-9. PubMed ID: 2278215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical management of tubal obstruction at the uterotubal junction. Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F; Nisolle-Pochet M; Waeyenberg M; Karaman Y Acta Eur Fertil; 1987; 18(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 3630568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure. Winston RM; Margara RA Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 1832011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Successful tubal anastomosis utilizing contralateral tubal segment in a case of unicornous uterus with a rudimentary horn]. Sato K; Kojima T; Takahashi K Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Nov; 42(11):1595-7. PubMed ID: 2273319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effects of experimental salpingoplasty on fertility in the rabbit]. Ebihara T; Kawakami S; Yoshimura Y; Ichikawa F; Tada S; Sakui H; Fukushima M Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Jul; 40(7):847-54. PubMed ID: 3418191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases]. Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 3734348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microsurgery versus laparoscopy in distal tubal obstruction hysterosalpingographically or laparoscopically investigated. Mossa B; Patella A; Ebano V; Pacifici E; Mossa S; Marziani R Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2005; 32(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 16433156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Possibilities and limits of endoscopic fallopian tube surgery]. Korell M; Strowitzki T; Hepp H Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 8585362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is microsurgery necessary for salpingostomy? The evaluation of results. Winston RM Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Aug; 21(3):143-52. PubMed ID: 7036983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Usefulness and results of microsurgery in the treatment of female sterility]. Fioretti P; Teti G; Maffei S; Murru MS Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1990; 111(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 2088155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgery of the fallopian tube. Taylor PJ; Leader A Int J Fertil; 1984; 29(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 6148319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Microsurgical treatment of proximal lesions of the fallopian tubes. Apropos of 51 cases]. Dubuisson JB; Aubriot FX; Barbot J; Thalabard JC; Dendrinos S; Henrion R J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1983; 12(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 6853978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]