These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2022368)
1. Employers and insurers battle against new UR regulations. Burke M Hospitals; 1991 May; 65(10):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 2022368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Managed-care entities could be held liable for UR decisions. Hinden RA Contract Healthc; 1988 Sep; ():26-7. PubMed ID: 10290607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Managed care law west of the Pecos. McCarthy R Bus Health; 1991 Jul; 9(7):73. PubMed ID: 10112456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Review firms under review. Kenkel PJ Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(36):98. PubMed ID: 10106189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who'll be liable when a patient is injured? Thomas MC Med Econ; 1991 Apr; 68(8):56-8, 60-2. PubMed ID: 10110089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspectives. Liability lawsuits: casting a wider net. Kent C Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1992 May; 46(18):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10117460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Will external review mandates revolutionize managed care? Lewis A Manag Care Interface; 2000 Oct; 13(10):64, 66. PubMed ID: 11155644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Managed health care: great cost savings with minimal legal risks. Postol LP Empl Benefits J; 1992 Sep; 17(3):32-4, 42. PubMed ID: 10121264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Appeals: the last word. Lewis A Med Interface; 1994 Aug; 7(8):50-5. PubMed ID: 10136816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reviewing the reviewers. Lazarus A Psychiatr Serv; 2001 Feb; 52(2):133. PubMed ID: 11157104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Liability implications of utilization review as a cost containment mechanism. Schessler CE J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():379-406. PubMed ID: 10118988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The UR controversy. Gemignani J Bus Health; 1999 Jul; 17(7):39-40. PubMed ID: 10539170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A treatment denial backfires--with a bang. Rice B Med Econ; 1998 Jul; 75(14):102-4, 107-8, 111. PubMed ID: 10181851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Payer contracts require close scrutiny. Andrew BL Health Prog; 1994 Nov; 75(9):18-9. PubMed ID: 10137946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Employers balk at provider-backed efforts to limit reach of utilization-review firms. Kenkel PJ Mod Healthc; 1991 Oct; 21(41):30. PubMed ID: 10114204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an outpatient utilization review program. Lawless GD J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Dec; 60(12):23-7. PubMed ID: 10296533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. District court rules on Texas Health Care Liability Act. Hansen E Manag Care Interface; 1998 Nov; 11(11):87-8. PubMed ID: 10187421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]