These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20223848)
1. Optimisation of tube voltage for conventional urography using a Gd2O2S:Tb flat panel detector. Zachrisson S; Hansson J; Cederblad A; Geterud K; Båth M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):86-91. PubMed ID: 20223848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An investigation of flat panel equipment variables on image quality with a dedicated cardiac phantom. Dragusin O; Bosmans H; Pappas C; Desmet W Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):4927-40. PubMed ID: 18711249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage. Tingberg A; Sjöström D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An optimisation strategy in a digital environment applied to neonatal chest imaging. Hansson J; Båth M; Håkansson M; Grundin H; Bjurklint E; Orvestad P; Kjellström A; Boström H; Jönsson M; Jonsson K; Månsson LG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15933122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individualized kV selection and tube current reduction in excretory phase computed tomography urography: potential for radiation dose reduction and the contribution of iterative reconstruction to image quality. Froemming AT; Kawashima A; Takahashi N; Hartman RP; Nathan MA; Carter RE; Yu L; Leng S; Kagoshima H; McCollough CH; Fletcher JG J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 23863531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses. Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and implementation of a compact low-dose diffraction enhanced medical imaging system. Parham C; Zhong Z; Connor DM; Chapman LD; Pisano ED Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):911-7. PubMed ID: 19375952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography using energy-integrating detectors. Lasio GM; Whiting BR; Williamson JF Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2247-66. PubMed ID: 17404467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of image quality and dose for Varian aS500 electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). McGarry CK; Grattan MW; Cosgrove VP Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6865-77. PubMed ID: 18029980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of subjective assessment of the low-contrast visibility in constancy control of computed tomography. Thilander-Klang A; Ledenius K; Hansson J; Sund P; Båth M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):449-54. PubMed ID: 20176732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physical evaluation of the weighted Feldkamp algorithms applied to the 256-detector row CT scanner for volumetric cine imaging. Mori S; Endo M; Kondo C; Tanada S Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun; 13(6):701-12. PubMed ID: 16679272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography. Zähringer M; Hesselmann V; Schulte O; Kamm KF; Braun W; Haupt G; Krug B; Lackner K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 14500204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-processing image filtration enabling dose reduction in standard abdominal CT. Leander P; Söderberg M; Fält T; Gunnarsson M; Albertsson I Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20207748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier. Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube. Honda C; Ohara H Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D. Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency of antiscatter grids for flat-detector CT. Kyriakou Y; Kalender W Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6275-93. PubMed ID: 17921585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]