These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20224326)
1. A primer in meta-analysis for the plastic surgeon. Temple C Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20224326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bibliographic study showed improving methodology of meta-analyses published in leading journals 1993-2002. Gerber S; Tallon D; Trelle S; Schneider M; Jüni P; Egger M J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 60(8):773-80. PubMed ID: 17606172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders. Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do orthopaedic journals provide high-quality evidence for clinical practice? Kiter E; Karatosun V; Günal I Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Apr; 123(2-3):82-5. PubMed ID: 12721685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new and rapid scoring system to assess the scientific evidence from clinical trials. Silber S J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 19(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17107362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide. Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Significance of Cochrane collaboration for evidence-based medicine]. Gøtzsche PC Lakartidningen; 2000 Jun; 97(26-27):3180-2. PubMed ID: 10925578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenges in meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials for rare harmful cardiovascular events: the case of rosiglitazone. Hernandez AV; Walker E; Ioannidis JP; Kattan MW Am Heart J; 2008 Jul; 156(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18585493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical methodology of meta-analysis of individual patient data using a survival outcome. Katsahian S; Latouche A; Mary JY; Chevret S; Porcher R Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 17884735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes. Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis: when and how. Imperiale TF Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Meta-analysis]. D'Arrigo G; Provenzano F; Torino C; Zoccali C; Tripepi G G Ital Nefrol; 2011; 28(5):531-6. PubMed ID: 22028267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Meta-analyses of randomized trials in oncology: pros and cons]. Hill C; Pignon JP Bull Cancer; 1999 Mar; 86(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 10210759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]