BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20224631)

  • 1. A note on inferring acyclic network structures using Granger causality tests.
    Nagarajan R
    Int J Biostat; 2009 Mar; 5(1):Article 10. PubMed ID: 20224631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Granger causality analysis of human cell-cycle gene expression profiles.
    Nagarajan R; Upreti M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article31. PubMed ID: 20812909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inferring functional relationships and causal network structure from gene expression profiles.
    Nagarajan R; Upreti M
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 487():133-46. PubMed ID: 21187224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference.
    Barnett L; Seth AK
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Feb; 223():50-68. PubMed ID: 24200508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A copula approach to assessing Granger causality.
    Hu M; Liang H
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():125-34. PubMed ID: 24945669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kernel canonical-correlation Granger causality for multiple time series.
    Wu G; Duan X; Liao W; Gao Q; Chen H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Apr; 83(4 Pt 1):041921. PubMed ID: 21599214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mitigating the effects of measurement noise on Granger causality.
    Nalatore H; Ding M; Rangarajan G
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):031123. PubMed ID: 17500684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of feedback loops in neural networks based on multi-step Granger causality.
    Dong CY; Shin D; Joo S; Nam Y; Cho KH
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Aug; 28(16):2146-53. PubMed ID: 22730429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of Granger causality through Artificial Neural Networks: applications to physiological systems and chaotic electronic oscillators.
    Antonacci Y; Minati L; Faes L; Pernice R; Nollo G; Toppi J; Pietrabissa A; Astolfi L
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e429. PubMed ID: 34084917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the Effectiveness of Causality Inference Methods for Gene Regulatory Networks.
    Ahmed SS; Roy S; Kalita J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 29994618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferring connectivity in networked dynamical systems: Challenges using Granger causality.
    Lusch B; Maia PD; Kutz JN
    Phys Rev E; 2016 Sep; 94(3-1):032220. PubMed ID: 27739857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kernel-Granger causality and the analysis of dynamical networks.
    Marinazzo D; Pellicoro M; Stramaglia S
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 May; 77(5 Pt 2):056215. PubMed ID: 18643150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint learning of multiple Granger causal networks via non-convex regularizations: Inference of group-level brain connectivity.
    Manomaisaowapak P; Songsiri J
    Neural Netw; 2022 May; 149():157-171. PubMed ID: 35240427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior knowledge driven Granger causality analysis on gene regulatory network discovery.
    Yao S; Yoo S; Yu D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():273. PubMed ID: 26316173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of multivariate causality based measures of effective connectivity.
    Wu MH; Frye RE; Zouridakis G
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Dec; 41(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 21742321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Granger causality for state-space models.
    Barnett L; Seth AK
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(4):040101. PubMed ID: 25974424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals: an approach to noisy data.
    Sommerlade L; Thiel M; Mader M; Mader W; Timmer J; Platt B; Schelter B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 239():47-64. PubMed ID: 25256644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to detect the Granger-causal flow direction in the presence of additive noise?
    Vinck M; Huurdeman L; Bosman CA; Fries P; Battaglia FP; Pennartz CM; Tiesinga PH
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():301-18. PubMed ID: 25514516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MGT-SM: A Method for Constructing Cellular Signal Transduction Networks.
    Li M; Zheng R; Li Y; Wu FX; Wang J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(2):417-424. PubMed ID: 28541220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confounding effects of indirect connections on causality estimation.
    Vakorin VA; Krakovska OA; McIntosh AR
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Oct; 184(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19628006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.