These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20224835)
1. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Anitua E; Tapia R; Luzuriaga F; Orive G Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Feb; 30(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 20224835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of macro-design of immediately loaded implants on micromotion and stress distribution in surrounding bone using finite element analysis. Fazel A; Aalai S; Rismanchian M Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 19667823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis. Pierrisnard L; Hure G; Barquins M; Chappard D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 12074450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of implant collar design on stress and strain distribution in the crestal compact bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Shen WL; Chen CS; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):901-10. PubMed ID: 20862403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of load transmission using different implant inclinations and cantilever lengths. Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Pera F; Menini M; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 19149073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined influence of implant diameter and alveolar ridge width on crestal bone stress: a quantitative approach. Yu W; Jang YJ; Kyung HM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 19344030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants. Lai H; Zhang F; Zhang B; Yang C; Xue M Chin J Dent Res; 1998 Dec; 1(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 10557165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of implant length and diameter prior to and after osseointegration: a 2-D finite element analysis. Georgiopoulos B; Kalioras K; Provatidis C; Manda M; Koidis P J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(5):243-56. PubMed ID: 17987856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants. Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]