183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20224925)
1. Chronic oral LOAEL prediction by using a commercially available computational QSAR tool.
Rupp B; Appel KE; Gundert-Remy U
Arch Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 84(9):681-8. PubMed ID: 20224925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chemical risk assessment and uncertainty associated with extrapolation across exposure duration.
Pohl HR; Chou CH; Ruiz P; Holler JS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Jun; 57(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19944126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the oral rat chronic lowest observed adverse effect level model in TOPKAT, a QSAR software package for toxicity prediction.
Venkatapathy R; Moudgal CJ; Bruce RM
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1623-9. PubMed ID: 15446819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the safe starting dose in phase I clinical trials and no observed effect level based on QSAR modeling of the human maximum recommended daily dose.
Contrera JF; Matthews EJ; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Dec; 40(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 15546675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.
Tetko IV; Sushko I; Pandey AK; Zhu H; Tropsha A; Papa E; Oberg T; Todeschini R; Fourches D; Varnek A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Sep; 48(9):1733-46. PubMed ID: 18729318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A procedure for developing risk-based reference doses.
Gaylor DW; Kodell RL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):137-41. PubMed ID: 12051999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to address nonlinear kinetics and changes in rodent physiology and metabolism due to aging and adaptation in deriving reference values for propylene glycol methyl ether and propylene glycol methyl ether acetate.
Kirman CR; Sweeney LM; Corley R; Gargas ML
Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):271-84. PubMed ID: 15876203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved in silico prediction of carcinogenic potency (TD50) and the risk specific dose (RSD) adjusted Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for genotoxic chemicals and pharmaceutical impurities.
Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 20933038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precision of estimates of an ADI (or TDI or PTWI).
Speijers GJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S87-93. PubMed ID: 10597619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health assessment of phosgene: approaches for derivation of reference concentration.
Gift JS; McGaughy R; Singh DV; Sonawane B
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Jun; 51(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 18440110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals I. Alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency.
Venkatapathy R; Wang CY; Bruce RM; Moudgal C
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2009 Jan; 234(2):209-21. PubMed ID: 18977375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
Box RJ; Spielmann H
Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the uncertainty factor for subchronic-to-chronic extrapolation: statistical analysis of toxicity data.
Pieters MN; Kramer HJ; Slob W
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Apr; 27(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 9671565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing computational toxicology models with phytochemicals.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Busta E; Minnier BL; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Feb; 54(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 20024931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the Potential Toxicity of Chemicals Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations Using Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling.
Yost EE; Stanek J; DeWoskin RS; Burgoon LD
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7732-42. PubMed ID: 27172125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification.
Kalkhof H; Herzler M; Stahlmann R; Gundert-Remy U
Arch Toxicol; 2012 Jan; 86(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 21735231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of effect levels of chemicals from quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. I. Chronic lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL).
Mumtaz MM; Knauf LA; Reisman DJ; Peirano WB; DeRosa CT; Gombar VK; Enslein K; Carter JR; Blake BW; Huque KI
Toxicol Lett; 1995 Sep; 79(1-3):131-43. PubMed ID: 7570650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
