296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20225081)
1. Comparison of three mobile devices for measuring R-R intervals and heart rate variability: Polar S810i, Suunto t6 and an ambulatory ECG system.
Weippert M; Kumar M; Kreuzfeld S; Arndt D; Rieger A; Stoll R
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2010 Jul; 109(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 20225081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor to measure RR intervals at rest.
Giles D; Draper N; Neil W
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Mar; 116(3):563-71. PubMed ID: 26708360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Novel Smartphone App for the Measurement of Ultra-Short-Term and Short-Term Heart Rate Variability: Validity and Reliability Study.
Chen YS; Lu WA; Pagaduan JC; Kuo CD
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e18761. PubMed ID: 32735219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Polar 810s and an ambulatory ECG system for RR interval measurement during progressive exercise.
Kingsley M; Lewis MJ; Marson RE
Int J Sports Med; 2005; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 15643533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Possibilities and limitations of the Polar RS800 in measuring heart rate variability at rest.
Wallén MB; Hasson D; Theorell T; Canlon B; Osika W
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2012 Mar; 112(3):1153-65. PubMed ID: 21766225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Polar® RS800G3™ heart rate monitor with Polar® S810i™ and electrocardiogram to obtain the series of RR intervals and analysis of heart rate variability at rest.
Barbosa MP; da Silva NT; de Azevedo FM; Pastre CM; Vanderlei LC
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 Mar; 36(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 25348547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Omega Wave System and Polar S810i to detect R-R intervals at rest.
Parrado E; García MA; Ramos J; Cervantes JC; Rodas G; Capdevila L
Int J Sports Med; 2010 May; 31(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 20180175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Polar S810i monitor and the ECG for the analysis of heart rate variability in the time and frequency domains.
Vanderlei LC; Silva RA; Pastre CM; Azevedo FM; Godoy MF
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2008 Oct; 41(10):854-9. PubMed ID: 18853042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of the Minicardio system for heart rate variability analysis compared to ECG.
Cassirame J; Stuckey MI; Sheppard F; Tordi N
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2013 Jun; 53(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 23715248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of three commercially available heart rate variability instruments using short-term (5-min) recordings.
Sandercock GR; Bromley P; Brodie DA
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Nov; 24(6):359-67. PubMed ID: 15522045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Polar® RS800CX heart rate monitor and electrocardiogram for measuring inter-beat intervals in healthy dogs.
Essner A; Sjöström R; Ahlgren E; Gustås P; Edge-Hughes L; Zetterberg L; Hellström K
Physiol Behav; 2015 Jan; 138():247-53. PubMed ID: 25446208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of fast Fourier transform and autoregressive spectral analysis for the study of heart rate variability in diabetic patients.
Chemla D; Young J; Badilini F; Maison-Blanche P; Affres H; Lecarpentier Y; Chanson P
Int J Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 104(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 16186061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and reliability of short-term heart-rate variability from the Polar S810.
Nunan D; Donovan G; Jakovljevic DG; Hodges LD; Sandercock GR; Brodie DA
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jan; 41(1):243-50. PubMed ID: 19092682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of time-domain short-term heart interval variability analysis using a wrist-worn heart rate monitor and the conventional electrocardiogram.
Porto LG; Junqueira LF
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 19140912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of Heart Rate Monitor Polar RS800 for Heart Rate Variability Analysis During Exercise.
Hernando D; Garatachea N; Almeida R; Casajús JA; Bailón R
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Mar; 32(3):716-725. PubMed ID: 27749728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Levels of agreement for RR intervals and short-term heart rate variability obtained from the Polar S810 and an alternative system.
Nunan D; Jakovljevic DG; Donovan G; Hodges LD; Sandercock GR; Brodie DA
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2008 Jul; 103(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 18427831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of ultra-short-term analysis as a surrogate of standard 5-min analysis of heart rate variability.
Baek HJ; Cho CH; Cho J; Woo JM
Telemed J E Health; 2015 May; 21(5):404-14. PubMed ID: 25807067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of the polar S810 heart rate monitor to measure R-R intervals at rest.
Gamelin FX; Berthoin S; Bosquet L
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 May; 38(5):887-93. PubMed ID: 16672842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Heart Rate Variability During Exercise: A Comparison of Artefact Correction Methods.
Giles DA; Draper N
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Mar; 32(3):726-735. PubMed ID: 29466273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement between three commercially available instruments for measuring short-term heart rate variability.
Sandercock GR; Shelton C; Bromley P; Brodie DA
Physiol Meas; 2004 Oct; 25(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 15535178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
