These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20225555)

  • 21. Cancer detection and mammogram volume of radiologists in a population-based screening programme.
    Rickard M; Taylor R; Page A; Estoesta J
    Breast; 2006 Feb; 15(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 16005226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Breast cancer: generalised screening in France from now on].
    Séradour B
    Rev Prat; 2004 Apr; 54(8):830-6. PubMed ID: 15274453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Organized or individual breast cancer screening: what motivates women?].
    Kalecinski J; Régnier-Denois V; Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Dumas A; Arveux P; Chauvin F
    Sante Publique; 2015; 27(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 26414035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Opportunistic screening of breast cancer in France].
    Wait S; Schaffer P; Séradour B; Chollot M; Demay M; Dejouhanet S
    Bull Cancer; 1997 Jun; 84(6):619-24. PubMed ID: 9295865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study.
    Skaane P; Skjennald A
    Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 15155893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
    Karssemeijer N; Bluekens AM; Beijerinck D; Deurenberg JJ; Beekman M; Visser R; van Engen R; Bartels-Kortland A; Broeders MJ
    Radiology; 2009 Nov; 253(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 19703851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A decentralized breast cancer screening program in the French department of Bas-Rhin].
    Schaffer P; Gairard B; Guldenfels C; Haehnel P; Dale G; Bellocq JP; Renaud R
    J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 81(8):845-57. PubMed ID: 10916002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer detection rate: designing imaging trials to demonstrate improvements.
    Jiang Y; Miglioretti DL; Metz CE; Schmidt RA
    Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):360-7. PubMed ID: 17456866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography.
    Burnside ES; Park JM; Fine JP; Sisney GA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Sep; 185(3):790-6. PubMed ID: 16120936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
    Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Opportunistic breast cancer screening in Hong Kong; a revisit of the Kwong Wah Hospital experience.
    Lui CY; Lam HS; Chan LK; Tam KF; Chan CM; Leung TY; Mak KL
    Hong Kong Med J; 2007 Apr; 13(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 17406037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
    von Fournier D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Screening for breast cancer: worries about its effectiveness].
    Autier P
    Rev Prat; 2013 Dec; 63(10):1369-77. PubMed ID: 24579331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
    JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
    Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
    Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.