BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20225622)

  • 1. [Validation of Differential Extraction Kit in forensic sexual assault cases].
    Wu D; Cao Y; Xu Y; He BF; Bi G; Zhou HG
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 25(6):440-2. PubMed ID: 20225622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
    Horsman KM; Barker SL; Ferrance JP; Forrest KA; Koen KA; Landers JP
    Anal Chem; 2005 Feb; 77(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 15679339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
    Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
    Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Filtration based DNA preparation for sexual assault cases.
    Garvin AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1084-7. PubMed ID: 14535671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A physical method for separating spermatozoa from epithelial cells in sexual assault evidence.
    Chen J; Kobilinsky L; Wolosin D; Shaler R; Baum H
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 9456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Capillary zone electrophoresis separation and collection of spermatozoa for the forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
    Wright SN; Huge BJ; Dovichi NJ
    Electrophoresis; 2020 Aug; 41(15):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 32453860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A proof of principal study on the use of direct PCR of semen and spermatozoa and development of a differential isolation protocol for use in cases of alleged sexual assault.
    Tobe SS; Swaran YC; Dennany L; Sibbing U; Schulze Johann K; Welch L; Vennemann M
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 27832353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Isolating sperm cells by laser capture microdissection technique from mixture sample].
    Liu F; Wang J; Yu LJ; Guo JZ; Gao JW; Jiao ZP; Tang H
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 27(1):33-5, 42. PubMed ID: 21542224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the AmpliFLP D1S80 PCR Amplification Kit for forensic casework analysis according to TWGDAM guidelines.
    Cosso S; Reynolds R
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 May; 40(3):424-34. PubMed ID: 7782746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HLA DQA1 and Polymarker validations for forensic casework: standard specimens, reproducibility, and mixed specimens.
    Gross AM; Guerrieri RA
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Nov; 41(6):1022-6. PubMed ID: 8914290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser microdissection separation of pure spermatozoa from epithelial cells for short tandem repeat analysis.
    Sanders CT; Sanchez N; Ballantyne J; Peterson DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):748-57. PubMed ID: 16882215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
    Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microchip-based cell lysis and DNA extraction from sperm cells for application to forensic analysis.
    Bienvenue JM; Duncalf N; Marchiarullo D; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16566759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
    Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extraction of DNA from forensic-type sexual assault specimens using simple, rapid sonication procedures.
    Crouse CA; Ban JD; D'Alessio JK
    Biotechniques; 1993 Oct; 15(4):641-4, 646, 648. PubMed ID: 7902722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the Yfiler® Plus PCR amplification kit for the detection of male DNA in semen-negative sexual assault cases.
    Henry J; Scandrett L
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):480-485. PubMed ID: 31472792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of spermatozoa using a novel 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay for forensic examination of sexual assaults.
    Liu KL; Tsai LC; Lin YC; Huang NE; Yang LJ; Su CW; Lee JC; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):1991-2004. PubMed ID: 32266534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
    Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DNA extraction from forensic samples using chelex.
    Butler JM
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2009 Jun; 2009(6):pdb.prot5229. PubMed ID: 20147187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.
    Wong H; Mihalovich J
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30044890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.