These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20226200)

  • 21. Numbers are represented in egocentric space: effects of numerical cues and spatial reference frames on hand laterality judgements.
    Conson M; Mazzarella E; Trojano L
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Mar; 452(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 19383434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bisections in two languages: when number processing, spatial representation, and habitual reading direction interact.
    Kazandjian S; Cavézian C; Zivotofsky AZ; Chokron S
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4031-7. PubMed ID: 20965204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interference between number processing and line bisection: a methodology.
    Calabria M; Rossetti Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(5):779-83. PubMed ID: 15721190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selective modulations of attentional asymmetries after sleep deprivation.
    Schmitz R; Deliens G; Mary A; Urbain C; Peigneux P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3351-60. PubMed ID: 21871469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Age-related changes in visual pseudoneglect.
    Schmitz R; Peigneux P
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Aug; 76(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 21536360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of optokinetically induced rotatory self-motion on spatial perception and representation.
    Sándor PS; Bächtold D; Henn V; Brugger P
    Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol; 2000 Jul; 13(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 10910090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Disrupted retinotopic maps in amblyopia.
    Mansouri B; Hansen BC; Hess RF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3218-25. PubMed ID: 19255157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of lateral head inclination on multimodal spatial orientation judgments in neglect: evidence for impaired spatial orientation constancy.
    Funk J; Finke K; Müller HJ; Utz KS; Kerkhoff G
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1616-27. PubMed ID: 20138897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Developmental changes in visual line bisection in women throughout adulthood.
    Beste C; Hamm JP; Hausmann M
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 30(2):753-67. PubMed ID: 16995835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.
    Brodie EE; Dunn EM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15919545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of local and global processing demands on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Oct; 59(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 16019116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of strategy on pseudoneglect for luminance judgements.
    Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 15919185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attentional and sensory effects of lowered levels of intrinsic alertness.
    Matthias E; Bublak P; Costa A; Müller HJ; Schneider WX; Finke K
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Dec; 47(14):3255-64. PubMed ID: 19682470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Left minineglect or inverse pseudoneglect in children with dyslexia?
    Michel C; Bidot S; Bonnetblanc F; Quercia P
    Neuroreport; 2011 Jan; 22(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 21164370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect.
    Masson N; Pesenti M; Dormal V
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1925-32. PubMed ID: 23774183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of focal and global attentional systems on spatial biases.
    Powers RM; Roth HL; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Aug; 58(3):318-23. PubMed ID: 15963382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Parameter-based assessment of spatial and non-spatial attentional deficits in Huntington's disease.
    Finke K; Bublak P; Dose M; Müller HJ; Schneider WX
    Brain; 2006 May; 129(Pt 5):1137-51. PubMed ID: 16504973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The capacity of attention and simultaneous perception of objects: a group study of Huntington's disease patients.
    Finke K; Schneider WX; Redel P; Dose M; Kerkhoff G; Müller HJ; Bublak P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3272-84. PubMed ID: 17681560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Left to right: representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Bradshaw JL
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1048-58. PubMed ID: 17967445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.