These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20226200)

  • 41. Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions.
    Gevers W; Santens S; Dhooge E; Chen Q; Van den Bossche L; Fias W; Verguts T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Feb; 139(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 20121318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Visual mental imagery: what the head's eye tells the mind's eye.
    Bourlon C; Oliviero B; Wattiez N; Pouget P; Bartolomeo P
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():287-97. PubMed ID: 20969839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Things that go bump in the right: the effect of unimanual activity on rightward collisions.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus A; Mayer K; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(5):1122-6. PubMed ID: 16999981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Radial character-line bisection.
    Jeong Y; Drago V; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2006 Jun; 19(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 16783133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Random number generation in neglect patients reveals enhanced response stereotypy, but no neglect in number space.
    Loetscher T; Brugger P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):276-9. PubMed ID: 18771676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.
    Loftus AM; Vijayakumar N; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 19231481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Looking for the answer: the mind's eye in number space.
    Loetscher T; Bockisch CJ; Brugger P
    Neuroscience; 2008 Feb; 151(3):725-9. PubMed ID: 18155853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Spatial nature of mental number line in neglect patients].
    Yang Q; Tian YH; Wang K
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 89(9):610-3. PubMed ID: 19595161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How do patients with neglect see a horizontal line? Analysis of performances in coloured line bisection task.
    Misonou K; Ishiai S; Seki K; Koyama Y; Nakano N
    J Neurol; 2004 Jun; 251(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 15311345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Explicit versus implicit processing of representational space in neglect: dissociations in accessing the mental number line.
    Priftis K; Zorzi M; Meneghello F; Marenzi R; Umiltà C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):680-8. PubMed ID: 16768369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space?
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Jan; 16(1):210-4. PubMed ID: 19835656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pseudoneglect and neglect for mental alphabet lines.
    Nicholls ME; Loftus AM
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1152():130-8. PubMed ID: 17442278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The influence of distractors and numerical direction on mental number line bisection.
    Thomas NA; Rose W; Nicholls ME
    Laterality; 2017 Jan; 22(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 26529579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect.
    Bultitude JH; Aimola Davies AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(10):1849-58. PubMed ID: 16701730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Spatial bias induced by a non-conflictual task reveals the nature of space perception.
    Dupierrix E; Alleysson D; Ohlmann T; Chokron S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1214():127-35. PubMed ID: 18462710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Glenn A. Fry award lecture: the "spatial grain" of the amblyopic visual system.
    Levi DM
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Oct; 65(10):767-86. PubMed ID: 3061307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking.
    Tomer R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18342343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Distribution of attention in normal people as a function of spatial location: right-left, up-down.
    Drago V; Crucian GP; Pisani F; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Jul; 12(4):532-7. PubMed ID: 16981605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Spatial biases in peripersonal space in sighted and blind individuals revealed by a haptic line bisection paradigm.
    Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Tinti C; Pascual-Leone A; Silvanto J; Vecchi T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1110-21. PubMed ID: 21517214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Putts that get missed on the right: investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf.
    Roberts R; Turnbull OH
    J Sports Sci; 2010 Feb; 28(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 20155570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.