BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20226413)

  • 1. Hysteroscopic sterilization in patients with a Mirena intrauterine device: transition from extended interval to permanent contraception.
    Tatalovich JM; Anderson TL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 20226413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device.
    Agostini A; Crochet P; Petrakian M; Estrade JP; Cravello L; Gamerre M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 18439497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiofrequency global endometrial ablation followed by hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; El-Nashar SA; Brown DL; Good AE; Famuyide AO
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 17630170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysteroscopic sterilization success in outpatient vs office setting is not affected by patient or procedural characteristics.
    Anderson TL; Yunker AC; Scheib SA; Callahan TL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):858-63. PubMed ID: 23891205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective analysis of office-based hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 16527710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of Essure placement in intrauterine device users.
    Mascaro M; MariƱo M; Vicens-Vidal M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 18602048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Shade GH; Diamond MP; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 18996773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting.
    Ubeda A; Labastida R; Dexeus S
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):196-9. PubMed ID: 15237011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.
    Lannon BM; Lee SY
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):497.e13-4. PubMed ID: 17397840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population.
    Shavell VI; Abdallah ME; Diamond MP; Kmak DC; Berman JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 18588851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.
    Sinha D; Kalathy V; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
    BJOG; 2007 Jun; 114(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 17516957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis.
    Levie MD; Chudnoff SG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(4):318-22. PubMed ID: 16036190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hysteroscopic sterilization in immunocompromised patients who have intrauterine devices in place: two case reports.
    Ladanyi C; Field C; Tocce K
    J Med Case Rep; 2015 Oct; 9():239. PubMed ID: 26506838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room.
    Nichols M; Carter JF; Fylstra DL; Childers M;
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 16962530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulation.
    Hopkins MR; Creedon DJ; Wagie AE; Williams AR; Famuyide AO
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 17218238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients.
    Panel P; Grosdemouge I
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19022435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of alternative treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding on hysterectomy rates in a tertiary referral center.
    van Dongen H; van de Merwe AG; de Kroon CD; Jansen FW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 18990612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polypectomy in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding: effectiveness of hysteroscopic removal.
    Henriquez DD; van Dongen H; Wolterbeek R; Jansen FW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 17218231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency and pregnancy outcome of serial intrauterine device-guided hysteroscopic adhesiolysis of intrauterine synechiae.
    Pabuccu R; Onalan G; Kaya C; Selam B; Ceyhan T; Ornek T; Kuzudisli E
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5):1973-7. PubMed ID: 18774563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improving hysterosalpingogram confirmatory test follow-up after Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.
    Guiahi M; Goldman KN; McElhinney MM; Olson CG
    Contraception; 2010 Jun; 81(6):520-4. PubMed ID: 20472120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.