1002 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20227211)
1. Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception.
Plumhans C; Mahnken AH; Ocklenburg C; Keil S; Behrendt FF; Günther RW; Schoth F
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Sep; 79(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 20227211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized clinical trial comparing ultrasound-guided procedure with the Seldinger's technique for placement of implantable venous ports.
Miao J; Ji L; Lu J; Chen J
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2014 Sep; 70(1):559-63. PubMed ID: 24748179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ultrasound guided implantation of chest port systems via the lateral subclavian vein].
Zähringer M; Hilgers J; Krüger K; Strohe D; Bangard C; Neumann L; Warm M; Reiser M; Töx U; Lackner K
Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 16508841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a totally implantable access port through the external jugular vein when the cephalic vein approach is not feasible.
Lin YC; Chu CH; Ou KW; Chan DC; Hsieh CB; Chen TW; Hsu HM; Yu JC
Ann Vasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 25(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 20926248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A single-incision technique for placement of implantable venous access ports via the axillary vein.
Seo TS; Song MG; Kang EY; Lee CH; Yong HS; Doo K
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1439-46. PubMed ID: 24613268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of outcomes and complications of totally implantable access port through the internal jugular vein versus the subclavian vein.
Nagasawa Y; Shimizu T; Sonoda H; Mekata E; Wakabayashi M; Ohta H; Murata S; Mori T; Naka S; Tani T
Int Surg; 2014; 99(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 24670030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term complications in totally implantable venous access devices: randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein puncture.
Ribeiro RC; Abib SC; Aguiar AS; Schettini ST
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2012 Feb; 58(2):274-7. PubMed ID: 21674765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
Hsu CC; Kwan GN; Evans-Barns H; Rophael JA; van Driel ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.
Biffi R; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Pace U; Bonomo G; Monfardini L; Della Vigna P; Rotmensz N; Radice D; Zampino MG; Fazio N; de Braud F; Andreoni B; Goldhirsch A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 19179550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conversion from cephalic vein to external jugular vein: success rate increased on totally implantable access ports with cut-down method.
Lin CH; Yu JC; Lee YT; Wu HS
Surg Innov; 2013 Dec; 20(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 23445713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.
Funaki B; Szymski GX; Hackworth CA; Rosenblum JD; Burke R; Chang T; Leef JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1431-4. PubMed ID: 9353475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sonographically guided venous puncture and fluoroscopically guided placement of tunneled, large-bore central venous catheters for bone marrow transplantation-high success rates and low complication rates.
Gebauer B; Teichgräber UM; Werk M; Beck A; Wagner HJ
Support Care Cancer; 2008 Aug; 16(8):897-904. PubMed ID: 18197436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center.
Ahn SJ; Kim HC; Chung JW; An SB; Yin YH; Jae HJ; Park JH
Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 22563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Totally implantable central venous port: analysis of complications and their prevention].
Smolyar AN; Ginzburg LM; Smirnov MA
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2019; (12):13-17. PubMed ID: 31825338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound-guided external jugular vein cannulation for central venous access by inexperienced trainees.
Mitre CI; Golea A; Acalovschi I; Mocan T; Caea AM; Ruţă C; Mariana M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Mar; 27(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 19935072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tunneled infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access.
Trerotola SO; Kuhn-Fulton J; Johnson MS; Shah H; Ambrosius WT; Kneebone PH
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11012428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Surgical complications of totally implantable venous access port in children with malignant tumors].
Li H; Gao YX; Wang SL; Yao HX
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Dec; 54(6):1167-1171. PubMed ID: 36533350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central venous infusion port inserted via high versus low jugular venous approaches: retrospective comparison of outcome and complications.
Park HS; Kim YI; Lee SH; Kim JI; Seo H; Lee SM; Lee Y; Lim MK; Park YS
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):494-8. PubMed ID: 19200682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of comfort and complications of Implantable Venous Access Port (IVAP) with ultrasound guided Internal Jugular Vein (IJV) and Axillary Vein/Subclavian Vein (AxV/SCV) puncture in breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled study.
Chen YB; Bao HS; Hu TT; He Z; Wen B; Liu FT; Su FX; Deng HR; Wu JN
BMC Cancer; 2022 Mar; 22(1):248. PubMed ID: 35248019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 1000 Port-A-Cath ® placements by subclavian vein approach: single surgeon experience.
Mudan S; Giakoustidis A; Morrison D; Iosifidou S; Raobaikady R; Neofytou K; Stebbing J
World J Surg; 2015 Feb; 39(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 25245435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
