179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20227321)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of a new system to improve screw fixation in osteoporotic bones.
Yánez A; Carta JA; Garcés G
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jun; 32(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 20227321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screw locking elements: a means to modify the flexibility of osteoporotic fracture fixation with DCPs without compromising system strength or stability.
Yánez A; Cuadrado A; Carta JA; Garcés G
Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jul; 34(6):717-24. PubMed ID: 21982962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of screw orientation in severely osteoporotic bone: a comparison with locked plating.
Zehnder S; Bledsoe JG; Puryear A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):589-94. PubMed ID: 19464094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can DCP and LCP plates generate more compression? The effect of multiple eccentrically placed screws and their drill positioning guides.
Ya'ish FM; Nanu AM; Cross AT
Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1095-100. PubMed ID: 21450288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How much do locked screws add to the fixation of "hybrid" plate constructs in osteoporotic bone?
Freeman AL; Tornetta P; Schmidt A; Bechtold J; Ricci W; Fleming M
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Mar; 24(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20182252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Locking plates increase the strength of dynamic hip screws.
Jewell DP; Gheduzzi S; Mitchell MS; Miles AW
Injury; 2008 Feb; 39(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 17880976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suitability of DCPs with screw locking elements to allow sufficient interfragmentary motion to promote secondary bone healing of osteoporotic fractures.
Cuadrado A; Yánez A; Carta JA; Garcés G
Med Eng Phys; 2013 Jun; 35(6):852-9. PubMed ID: 22998895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Locked plate fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures: are two locking screws per segment enough?
Hak DJ; Althausen P; Hazelwood SJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Apr; 24(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 20335752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.
Filipowicz D; Lanz O; McLaughlin R; Elder S; Werre S
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19597629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Less rigid stable fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone using locked plates with near cortical slots.
Gardner MJ; Nork SE; Huber P; Krieg JC
Injury; 2010 Jun; 41(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 20236642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate.
Aguila AZ; Manos JM; Orlansky AS; Todhunter RJ; Trotter EJ; Van der Meulen MC
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 16594390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model.
Roberts JW; Grindel SI; Rebholz B; Wang M
J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 32(7):971-5. PubMed ID: 17826548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Jones fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison of partially threaded screws versus tapered variable pitch screws.
Orr JD; Glisson RR; Nunley JA
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 40(3):691-8. PubMed ID: 22227846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A short plate compression screw with diagonal bolts--a biomechanical evaluation performed experimentally and by numerical computation.
Peleg E; Mosheiff R; Liebergall M; Mattan Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):963-8. PubMed ID: 16893595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the mechanical behaviors of semicontoured, locking plate-rod fixation and anatomically contoured, conventional plate-rod fixation applied to experimentally induced gap fractures in canine femora.
Goh CS; Santoni BG; Puttlitz CM; Palmer RH
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jan; 70(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19119945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.
Cullen AB; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
