227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20228541)
1. The influence of training on the recognition of gross features of dermoscopy images.
Yucel A; Gunasti S; Aksungur VL
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2010; 76(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 20228541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Algorithmic reproduction of asymmetry and border cut-off parameters according to the ABCD rule for dermoscopy.
Pellacani G; Grana C; Seidenari S
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2006 Nov; 20(10):1214-9. PubMed ID: 17062034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-point checklist of dermoscopy: an open internet study.
Zalaudek I; Argenziano G; Soyer HP; Corona R; Sera F; Blum A; Braun RP; Cabo H; Ferrara G; Kopf AW; Langford D; Menzies SW; Pellacani G; Peris K; Seidenari S;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Mar; 154(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 16445771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical selection of melanocytic lesions for dermoscopy decreases the identification of suspicious lesions in comparison with dermoscopy without clinical preselection.
Seidenari S; Longo C; Giusti F; Pellacani G
Br J Dermatol; 2006 May; 154(5):873-9. PubMed ID: 16634889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Level of confidence in diagnosis: clinical examination versus dermoscopy examination.
Benvenuto-Andrade C; Dusza SW; Hay JL; Agero AL; Halpern AC; Kopf AW; Marghoob AA
Dermatol Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):738-44. PubMed ID: 16706773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Instrument-, age- and site-dependent variations of dermoscopic patterns of congenital melanocytic naevi: a multicentre study.
Seidenari S; Pellacani G; Martella A; Giusti F; Argenziano G; Buccini P; Carli P; Catricalà C; De Giorgi V; Ferrari A; Ingordo V; Manganoni AM; Peris K; Piccolo D; Pizzichetta MA
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 155(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 16792752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency, clinical and dermoscopic features of benign papillomatous melanocytic naevi (Unna type).
Niederkorn A; Ahlgrimm-Siess V; Fink-Puches R; Wolf IH; Richtig E; Lackner HK; Hofmann-Wellenhof R
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 161(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 19466956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of digital dermoscopy in a pigmented lesion clinic: clinician versus computer assessment of malignancy risk.
Boldrick JC; Layton CJ; Nguyen J; Swetter SM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 56(3):417-21. PubMed ID: 17109995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can automated dermoscopy image analysis instruments provide added benefit for the dermatologist? A study comparing the results of three systems.
Perrinaud A; Gaide O; French LE; Saurat JH; Marghoob AA; Braun RP
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Nov; 157(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 17854361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of the clinical history for different users of dermoscopy compared with results of digital image analysis.
Blum A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Luedtke H; Ellwanger U; Steins A; Roehm S; Garbe C; Soyer HP
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2004 Nov; 18(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 15482291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dermoscopy patterns of halo nevi.
Kolm I; Di Stefani A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Fink-Puches R; Wolf IH; Richtig E; Smolle J; Kerl H; Soyer HP; Zalaudek I
Arch Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 142(12):1627-32. PubMed ID: 17178990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: clinical and dermoscopic features.
Pizzichetta MA; Talamini R; Stanganelli I; Puddu P; Bono R; Argenziano G; Veronesi A; Trevisan G; Rabinovitz H; Soyer HP
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jun; 150(6):1117-24. PubMed ID: 15214897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of dermoscopic features of congenital melanocytic nevi.
Ingordo V; Iannazzone SS; Cusano F; Naldi L
Dermatology; 2008; 217(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 18663305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of dermoscopic structures of melanocytic lesions to reflectance confocal microscopy.
Scope A; Benvenuto-Andrade C; Agero AL; Halpern AC; Gonzalez S; Marghoob AA
Arch Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 17309998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions.
Benvenuto-Andrade C; Dusza SW; Agero AL; Scope A; Rajadhyaksha M; Halpern AC; Marghoob AA
Arch Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 143(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 17372097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of melanoma from dermoscopic images of naevi acquired under uncontrolled conditions.
Tenenhaus A; Nkengne A; Horn JF; Serruys C; Giron A; Fertil B
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 20384887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative evaluation of elderly skin based on digital image analysis.
Tanaka H; Nakagami G; Sanada H; Sari Y; Kobayashi H; Kishi K; Konya C; Tadaka E
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 18412562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dermoscopic and histopathologic diagnosis of equivocal melanocytic skin lesions: an interdisciplinary study on 107 cases.
Ferrara G; Argenziano G; Soyer HP; Corona R; Sera F; Brunetti B; Cerroni L; Chimenti S; El Shabrawi-Caelen L; Ferrari A; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Kaddu S; Piccolo D; Scalvenzi M; Staibano S; Wolf IH; De Rosa G
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(5):1094-100. PubMed ID: 12209696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dermoscopy of skin lesions in two patients with xeroderma pigmentosum.
Malvehy J; Puig S; Martí-Laborda RM
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 152(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 15727638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limitations of dermoscopy in the recognition of melanoma.
Skvara H; Teban L; Fiebiger M; Binder M; Kittler H
Arch Dermatol; 2005 Feb; 141(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 15724011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
