BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20229121)

  • 1. Correlation between pyramidal signs and the severity of cervical myelopathy.
    Chikuda H; Seichi A; Takeshita K; Shoda N; Ono T; Matsudaira K; Kawaguchi H; Nakamura K
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1684-9. PubMed ID: 20229121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple foot tapping test as a quantitative objective assessment of cervical myelopathy.
    Numasawa T; Ono A; Wada K; Yamasaki Y; Yokoyama T; Aburakawa S; Takeuchi K; Kumagai G; Kudo H; Umeda T; Nakaji S; Toh S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 21252819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity of Pyramidal Signs in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
    Elnoamany H
    Asian Spine J; 2016 Feb; 10(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 26949460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance T2 image signal intensity ratio and clinical manifestation predict prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Zhang YZ; Shen Y; Wang LF; Ding WY; Xu JX; He J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E396-9. PubMed ID: 20393392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical correlations of cervical myelopathy and the Hoffmann sign.
    Houten JK; Noce LA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2008 Sep; 9(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 18928217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity.
    Aota Y; Niwa T; Uesugi M; Yamashita T; Inoue T; Saito T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):814-20. PubMed ID: 18379411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome.
    Houten JK; Cooper PR
    Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 12699550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevalence of physical signs in cervical myelopathy: a prospective, controlled study.
    Rhee JM; Heflin JA; Hamasaki T; Freedman B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):890-5. PubMed ID: 19352222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of cervical myelopathy using transcranial magnetic stimulation and prediction of prognosis after laminoplasty.
    Takahashi J; Hirabayashi H; Hashidate H; Ogihara N; Yamazaki I; Kamimura M; Ebara S; Kato H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E15-20. PubMed ID: 18165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Alafifi T; Kern R; Fehlings M
    J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Ten second step test" as a new quantifiable parameter of cervical myelopathy.
    Yukawa Y; Kato F; Ito K; Horie Y; Nakashima H; Masaaki M; Ito ZY; Wakao N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 19127165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on magnetic resonance images in cervical compressive myelopathy. Does it predict the outcome of conservative treatment?
    Matsumoto M; Toyama Y; Ishikawa M; Chiba K; Suzuki N; Fujimura Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Mar; 25(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 10752098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 10-second step test for quantitative evaluation of the severity of thoracic compressive myelopathy.
    Ogawa Y; Yukawa Y; Morita D; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(16):1405-8. PubMed ID: 23632337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance of increased signal intensity on MRI in prognosis after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Zhang P; Shen Y; Zhang YZ; Ding WY; Wang LF
    J Clin Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 18(8):1080-3. PubMed ID: 21696960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy.
    Vitzthum HE; Dalitz K
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2096-103. PubMed ID: 17922150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Correlation between increased spinal cord signal intensity on T2-weighted MRI and clinical prognosis of compressive cervical myelopathy].
    Zhang KZ; Tu HH; Liu ZL; Lou XL; Chai JS; Zhang T; Zhou RP
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Oct; 29(10):2018-20. PubMed ID: 19861254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective cohort study of mild cervical spondylotic myelopathy without surgical treatment.
    Sumi M; Miyamoto H; Suzuki T; Kaneyama S; Kanatani T; Uno K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21981274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Relation of MR T2 image signal intensity ratio of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with clinical manifestations and prognosis].
    Shen Y; Zhang YZ; Wang LF
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 88(43):3072-6. PubMed ID: 19192409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of magnetic resonance imaging signal changes and outcome prediction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Vedantam A; Jonathan A; Rajshekhar V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec; 15(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 21923236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcranial magnetic stimulation screening for cord compression in cervical spondylosis.
    Lo YL; Chan LL; Lim W; Tan SB; Tan CT; Chen JL; Fook-Chong S; Ratnagopal P
    J Neurol Sci; 2006 May; 244(1-2):17-21. PubMed ID: 16478626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.