372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20229429)
1. The case of Samuel Golubchuk and the right to be spared an excruciating death.
Bailey TM; Leier B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):67-8. PubMed ID: 20229429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to live: priority and the roles of physicians.
Riddle CA
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 20229430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Intent, authority, and tradition at the end of life.
Hackler C
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):64-5. PubMed ID: 20229427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reflections on the Golubchuk case.
Gesundheit B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):73-4. PubMed ID: 20229432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The case of Samuel Golubchuk: the dangers of judicial deference and medical self-regulation.
Pope TM
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):59-61. PubMed ID: 20229425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The case of Samuel Golubchuk.
Zivot JB
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):56-7. PubMed ID: 20229423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. No ethical or legal imperative to provide life support to a permanently unaware patient.
Cantor NL
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):58-9. PubMed ID: 20229424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The secret of caring for Mr. Golubchuk.
Jotkowitz A; Glick S; Zivotofsky AZ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):W6-7. PubMed ID: 20229404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The case of Samuel Golubchuk and the right to live.
Jotkowitz A; Glick S; Zivotofsky AZ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):50-3. PubMed ID: 20229421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Do everything!" Encountering "futility" in medical practice.
Nelson SN
Ethics Med; 2003; 19(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15025117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Autonomy does not confer sovereignty on the patient: a commentary on the Golubchuk case.
Paris JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):54-6. PubMed ID: 20229422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The problem with home remedies: Manitoba, doctors and unilateral decisions in end-of-life care.
Murphy P; Webster GC; Chaze B
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):71-3. PubMed ID: 20229431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Controversial end-of-life issues in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Isaacs D
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 11(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 21337279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Deactivation of implantable defibrillators--also an ethical issue. Written routines of the process are necessary as illustrated by the described case report].
Carlsson J; Mansson A; Olsson D
Lakartidningen; 2011 Mar 9-15; 108(10):536-9. PubMed ID: 21744554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability in the limitation of life support in pediatrics continues.
Catlin AJ
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 20120852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: ethical considerations.
Reynolds S; Cooper AB; McKneally M
Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):919-36, viii. PubMed ID: 17888789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to open peer commentaries for "Unnecessary time pressure in refusal of life-sustaining therapies".
Cochrane TI
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(4):W5-6. PubMed ID: 19326301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability in the pediatric intensivists' threshold for withdrawal/limitation of life support as perceived by bedside nurses.
Gresiuk C; Joffe A
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(4):316-26. PubMed ID: 20120851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A Jewish perspective on the refusal of life-sustaining therapies: culture as shaping bioethical discourse.
Ravitsky V
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(4):60-2. PubMed ID: 19326319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Jewish law and end-of-life decision making: a case report.
Blinderman CD
J Clin Ethics; 2007; 18(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 18321000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
