These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20229863)

  • 1. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
    Sayre GA; Ruan D
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
    Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
    Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning.
    Appenzoller LM; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Mutic S; Moore KL
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7446-61. PubMed ID: 23231294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT.
    Malone S; Croke J; Roustan-Delatour N; Belanger E; Avruch L; Malone C; Morash C; Kayser C; Underhill K; Li Y; Malone K; Nyiri B; Spaans J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):725-32. PubMed ID: 22444999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
    Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
    Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IMRT: improvement in treatment planning efficiency using NTCP calculation independent of the dose-volume-histogram.
    Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Grigorov L; Jiang R; Barnett RB
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1250-8. PubMed ID: 16752559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
    Gordon JJ; Crimaldi AJ; Hagan M; Moore J; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 17278506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Target miss using PTV-based IMRT compared to robust optimization via coverage probability concept in prostate cancer.
    Outaggarts Z; Wegener D; Berger B; Zips D; Paulsen F; Bleif M; Thorwarth D; Alber M; Dohm O; Müller AC
    Acta Oncol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):911-917. PubMed ID: 32436467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
    Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An approach to multiobjective optimization of rotational therapy. II. Pareto optimal surfaces and linear combinations of modulated blocked arcs for a prostate geometry.
    Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
    Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2606-16. PubMed ID: 20632572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
    Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher M; Silva J; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1102-11. PubMed ID: 22320820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
    Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EUD-based margin selection in the presence of set-up uncertainties.
    Song W; Dunscombe P
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15125003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
    Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-guided dose-volume objectives.
    Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Wu Y; Zhou J; Liu HH; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 12608607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of MLC leaf width and PTV margin on the treatment planning of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMSRS) or radiotherapy (IMSRT).
    Chang J; Yenice KM; Jiang K; Hunt M; Narayana A
    Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 19410139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 68.