1331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20229863)
1. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new method of incorporating systematic uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization.
Yang J; Mageras GS; Spirou SV; Jackson A; Yorke E; Ling CC; Chui CS
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2567-79. PubMed ID: 16193787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning.
Appenzoller LM; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Mutic S; Moore KL
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7446-61. PubMed ID: 23231294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT.
Malone S; Croke J; Roustan-Delatour N; Belanger E; Avruch L; Malone C; Morash C; Kayser C; Underhill K; Li Y; Malone K; Nyiri B; Spaans J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):725-32. PubMed ID: 22444999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IMRT: improvement in treatment planning efficiency using NTCP calculation independent of the dose-volume-histogram.
Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Grigorov L; Jiang R; Barnett RB
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1250-8. PubMed ID: 16752559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of clinical margins via simulation of patient setup errors in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Crimaldi AJ; Hagan M; Moore J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):202-14. PubMed ID: 17278506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Target miss using PTV-based IMRT compared to robust optimization via coverage probability concept in prostate cancer.
Outaggarts Z; Wegener D; Berger B; Zips D; Paulsen F; Bleif M; Thorwarth D; Alber M; Dohm O; Müller AC
Acta Oncol; 2020 Aug; 59(8):911-917. PubMed ID: 32436467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An approach to multiobjective optimization of rotational therapy. II. Pareto optimal surfaces and linear combinations of modulated blocked arcs for a prostate geometry.
Pardo-Montero J; Fenwick JD
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2606-16. PubMed ID: 20632572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher M; Silva J; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1102-11. PubMed ID: 22320820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. EUD-based margin selection in the presence of set-up uncertainties.
Song W; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):849-59. PubMed ID: 15125003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans.
Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization with gEUD-guided dose-volume objectives.
Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Wu Y; Zhou J; Liu HH; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 12608607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of MLC leaf width and PTV margin on the treatment planning of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMSRS) or radiotherapy (IMSRT).
Chang J; Yenice KM; Jiang K; Hunt M; Narayana A
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 19410139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
