1517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20229900)
1. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wagner RF; Petrick N
Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2654-68. PubMed ID: 10619251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: the effect of finite sample size.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Wagner RF; Hadjiiski L
Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1509-22. PubMed ID: 10947254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classifier performance prediction for computer-aided diagnosis using a limited dataset.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1559-70. PubMed ID: 18491550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feature extraction and pattern classification of colorectal polyps in colonoscopic imaging.
Fu JJ; Yu YW; Lin HM; Chai JW; Chen CC
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Jun; 38(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 24495469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection of lung nodules: false positive reduction using a 3D gradient field method and 3D ellipsoid fitting.
Ge Z; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Cascade PN; Bogot N; Kazerooni EA; Wei J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2443-54. PubMed ID: 16193773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer aided characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule using volumetric and contrast enhancement features.
Shah SK; McNitt-Gray MF; Rogers SR; Goldin JG; Suh RD; Sayre JW; Petkovska I; Kim HJ; Aberle DR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Oct; 12(10):1310-9. PubMed ID: 16179208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: improvement of classification performance with nodule surface features.
Way TW; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Cascade PN; Chughtai A; Bogot N; Kazerooni E
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3086-98. PubMed ID: 19673208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules.
Hua J; Xiong Z; Lowey J; Suh E; Dougherty ER
Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1509-15. PubMed ID: 15572470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications.
Wei L; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Mar; 24(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 15754987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new computationally efficient CAD system for pulmonary nodule detection in CT imagery.
Messay T; Hardie RC; Rogers SK
Med Image Anal; 2010 Jun; 14(3):390-406. PubMed ID: 20346728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multilevel analysis of spatiotemporal association features for differentiation of tumor enhancement patterns in breast DCE-MRI.
Lee SH; Kim JH; Cho N; Park JS; Yang Z; Jung YS; Moon WK
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):3940-56. PubMed ID: 20879557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new and fast image feature selection method for developing an optimal mammographic mass detection scheme.
Tan M; Pu J; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081906. PubMed ID: 25086537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.
Park SC; Pu J; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):266-74. PubMed ID: 19201355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.
Paquerault S; Hardy PT; Wersto N; Chen J; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1112-21. PubMed ID: 20605489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A mechatronics platform to study prosthetic hand control using EMG signals.
Geethanjali P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Sep; 39(3):765-71. PubMed ID: 27278475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices.
Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
