These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20230317)
1. Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix. Cheung CW; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Chan OK; Chan LW; Fung TY; Lau TK J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Dec; 23(12):1406-12. PubMed ID: 20230317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, Bishop score, and sonographic cervical length: tolerability and prediction of vaginal birth and vaginal birth within 24 hours following labour induction in nulliparous women. Vallikkannu N; Lam WK; Omar SZ; Tan PC BJOG; 2017 Jul; 124(8):1274-1283. PubMed ID: 27348806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery. Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix. Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Tomera S; Scandroglio S; Colombo G; Bolis P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial. Abdullah ZHA; Chew KT; Velayudham VRV; Yahaya Z; Jamil AAM; Abu MA; Ghani NAA; Ismail NAM PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval. Rane SM; Pandis GK; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 12858301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour. Elghorori MR; Hassan I; Dartey W; Abdel-Aziz E; Bradley M J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 May; 17(5):315-22. PubMed ID: 16147844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting preterm delivery in asymptomatic patients with prior preterm delivery by measurement of cervical length and phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1. Bittar RE; da Fonseca EB; de Carvalho MH; Martinelli S; Zugaib M Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 17444550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound assessment of the cervix in predicting successful membrane sweeping: a prospective observational study. Rizzo G; Aloisio F; Yacoub M; Bitsadze V; Słodki M; Makatsariya A; D'Antonio F J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Mar; 34(6):852-858. PubMed ID: 31092080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between detection of the cervical gland area during the late third trimester and necessity for induction of labor to prevent post-term delivery. Minami Y; Sekiya T; Nishizawa H; Miyazaki J; Noda Y; Ishii R; Yasue A; Nishio E; Udagawa Y; Fujii T J Med Ultrason (2001); 2014 Oct; 41(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 27278027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Labour induction at term: clinical, biophysical and molecular predictive factors. Riboni F; Garofalo G; Pascoli I; Vitulo A; Dell'avanzo M; Battagliarin G; Paternoster D Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1123-9. PubMed ID: 22729138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of newborn admission after labour induction at term: Bishop score, pre-induction ultrasonography and clinical risk factors. Tan PC; Suguna S; Vallikkannu N; Hassan J Singapore Med J; 2008 Mar; 49(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 18362999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound and clinical predictors for Caesarean delivery after labour induction at term. Tan PC; Suguna S; Vallikkannu N; Hassan J Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Dec; 46(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 17116055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]