208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20230501)
1. Decreased respiratory sinus arrhythmia in individuals with deceptive intent.
Aikins DE; Martin DJ; Morgan CA
Psychophysiology; 2010 Jul; 47(4):633-6. PubMed ID: 20230501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy to investigate hemodynamic responses to deception in the prefrontal cortex.
Tian F; Sharma V; Kozel FA; Liu H
Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1303():120-30. PubMed ID: 19782657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Types of deception revealed by individual differences in cognitive abilities.
Morgan CJ; LeSage JB; Kosslyn SM
Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):554-69. PubMed ID: 18654937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thirty-site P300 scalp distribution, amplitude variance across sites, and amplitude in detection of deceptive concealment of multiple guilty items.
Lui MA; Rosenfeld JP; Ryan AH
Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):491-509. PubMed ID: 18633836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination.
Gamer M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Apr; 76(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20114064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.
Dionisio DP; Granholm E; Hillix WA; Perrine WF
Psychophysiology; 2001 Mar; 38(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 11347866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Facial skin surface temperature changes during a "concealed information" test.
Pollina DA; Dollins AB; Senter SM; Brown TE; Pavlidis I; Levine JA; Ryan AH
Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 34(7):1182-9. PubMed ID: 16786391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Separating deceptive and orienting components in a Concealed Information Test.
Ambach W; Stark R; Peper M; Vaitl D
Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 18674573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia and cognitive functioning in children.
Staton L; El-Sheikh M; Buckhalt JA
Dev Psychobiol; 2009 Apr; 51(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 19107730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia as a measure of cognitive workload.
Muth ER; Moss JD; Rosopa PJ; Salley JN; Walker AD
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 22079827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia during stress predicts resting respiratory sinus arrhythmia 3 years later in a pediatric sample.
Salomon K
Health Psychol; 2005 Jan; 24(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15631564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia responses to cognitive tasks: effects of task factors and RSA indices.
Overbeek TJ; van Boxtel A; Westerink JH
Biol Psychol; 2014 May; 99():1-14. PubMed ID: 24561100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards clinical trials of lie detection with fMRI.
Hakun JG; Ruparel K; Seelig D; Busch E; Loughead JW; Gur RC; Langleben DD
Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(6):518-27. PubMed ID: 18633835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychopathy and deception detection.
Martin K; Leach AM
Personal Ment Health; 2013 May; 7(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24343941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding.
Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(7):878-901. PubMed ID: 14998703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deceptive Intentions: Can Cues to Deception Be Measured before a Lie Is Even Stated?
Ströfer S; Noordzij ML; Ufkes EG; Giebels E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125237. PubMed ID: 26018573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
