243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20230960)
1. The frequency of replacement of dental restorations may vary based on a number of variables, including type of material, size of the restoration, and caries risk of the patient.
Roumanas ED
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 20230960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
Varpio M
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
De Moor R; Delmé K
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes for early childhood caries: influence of aggressive dental surgery.
Graves CE; Berkowitz RJ; Proskin HM; Chase I; Weinstein P; Billings R
J Dent Child (Chic); 2004; 71(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 15587091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.
Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D
Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Placement and replacement of dental restorations.
Mahmood S; Chohan AN; Al-Jannakh M; Al-Baker H; Smales RJ
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Oct; 14(10):589-92. PubMed ID: 15456546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 22771415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
Lyons K;
N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extent of tooth decay in the mouth and increased need for replacement of dental restorations: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
Trachtenberg F; Maserejian NN; Tavares M; Soncini JA; Hayes C
Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 18942597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
