These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20231912)

  • 1. A marginal mixture model for selecting differentially expressed genes across two types of tissue samples.
    Qiu W; He W; Wang X; Lazarus R
    Int J Biostat; 2008 Oct; 4(1):Article 20. PubMed ID: 20231912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical Bayes ranking and selection methods via semiparametric hierarchical mixture models in microarray studies.
    Noma H; Matsui S
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1904-16. PubMed ID: 23281021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A SATS algorithm for jointly identifying multiple differentially expressed gene sets.
    Yang TY
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(16):2028-39. PubMed ID: 21472762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative review of statistical methods for discovering differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments.
    Pan W
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Apr; 18(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 12016052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian nonparametric variable selection as an exploratory tool for discovering differentially expressed genes.
    Shahbaba B; Johnson WO
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):2114-26. PubMed ID: 23172736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detecting differentially expressed genes by relative entropy.
    Yan X; Deng M; Fung WK; Qian M
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Jun; 234(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 15784273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.
    Yu F; Chen MH; Kuo L; Talbott H; Davis JS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():245. PubMed ID: 26250443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene selection: a Bayesian variable selection approach.
    Lee KE; Sha N; Dougherty ER; Vannucci M; Mallick BK
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jan; 19(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 12499298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian mixture model for metaanalysis of microarray studies.
    Conlon EM
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2008 Feb; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 17879102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian ranking and selection methods using hierarchical mixture models in microarray studies.
    Noma H; Matsui S; Omori T; Sato T
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 19946026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data.
    McLachlan GJ; Bean RW; Peel D
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Mar; 18(3):413-22. PubMed ID: 11934740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A GMM-IG framework for selecting genes as expression panel biomarkers.
    Wang M; Chen JY
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):75-82. PubMed ID: 20004087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the proportion of equivalently expressed genes in microarray data based on transformed test statistics.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):177-87. PubMed ID: 20078228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An empirical Bayesian method for estimating biological networks from temporal microarray data.
    Rau A; Jaffrézic F; Foulley JL; Doerge RW
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article 9. PubMed ID: 20196759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An empirical Bayes method for robust variance estimation in detecting DEGs using microarray data.
    You N; Wang X
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Oct; 15(5):1750020. PubMed ID: 28893113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A sub-space greedy search method for efficient Bayesian Network inference.
    Zhang Q; Cao Y; Li Y; Zhu Y; Sun SS; Guo D
    Comput Biol Med; 2011 Sep; 41(9):763-70. PubMed ID: 21741635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biclustering of gene expression data by an extension of mixtures of factor analyzers.
    Martella F; Alfò M; Vichi M
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 3. PubMed ID: 22462105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian classification and non-Bayesian label estimation via EM algorithm to identify differentially expressed genes: a comparative study.
    Antunes M; Sousa L
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):824-36. PubMed ID: 18932140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene selection from microarray data for cancer classification--a machine learning approach.
    Wang Y; Tetko IV; Hall MA; Frank E; Facius A; Mayer KF; Mewes HW
    Comput Biol Chem; 2005 Feb; 29(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15680584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informative or noninformative calls for gene expression: a latent variable approach.
    Kasim A; Lin D; Van Sanden S; Clevert DA; Bijnens L; Göhlmann H; Amaratunga D; Hochreiter S; Shkedy Z; Talloen W
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article 4. PubMed ID: 20196754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.