These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20232076)

  • 1. Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children.
    Wilscher S; Wabbels B; Lorenz B
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 248(10):1493-500. PubMed ID: 20232076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility and outcome of automated static perimetry in children using continuous light increment perimetry (CLIP) and fast threshold strategy.
    Wabbels BK; Wilscher S
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Dec; 83(6):664-9. PubMed ID: 16396642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of kinetic programs in various automated perimeters.
    Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Eura M; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 61(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 28444485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The feasibility of short automated static perimetry in children.
    Morales J; Brown SM
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Jan; 108(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 11150282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): evaluation of kinetic approaches in childhood neuro-ophthalmic disease.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 103(8):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 30232171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automated kinetic perimetry using different stimulus velocities].
    Wabbels B; Kolling G
    Ophthalmologe; 2001 Feb; 98(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 11263043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice?
    Szatmáry G; Biousse V; Newman NJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Rahi JS;
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130895. PubMed ID: 26091102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing In Children (OPTIC): development and feasibility of the kinetic perimetry reliability measure (KPRM).
    Patel DE; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 101(2):94-96. PubMed ID: 28108479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning effect and repeatability of automated kinetic perimetry in healthy participants.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Sep; 39(9):928-37. PubMed ID: 24588228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of stimulus velocity in automated kinetic perimetry in young healthy participants.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Okada A; Takano K; Tomioka S
    Vision Res; 2014 May; 98():83-8. PubMed ID: 24705075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Quality and Output of Different Optimal Perimetric Testing Approaches in Children With Glaucoma.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Brookes J; Papadopoulos M; Khaw PT; Viswanathan AC; Garway-Heath D; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 29285534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normal isopter position in the peripheral visual field in goldmann kinetic perimetry.
    Niederhauser S; Mojon DS
    Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(6):406-8. PubMed ID: 12566882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm (program k) for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Takada S; Arimura-Koike E; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 56(3):2092-9. PubMed ID: 25744980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.
    Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of central and peripheral visual field properties in the optic neuritis treatment trial.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Spurr JO; Beck RW
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1999 Nov; 128(5):543-53. PubMed ID: 10577521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physiologic statokinetic dissociation is eliminated by equating static and kinetic perimetry testing procedures.
    Phu J; Al-Saleem N; Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK
    J Vis; 2016 Nov; 16(14):5. PubMed ID: 27829104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry.
    Bevers C; Blanckaert G; Van Keer K; Fils JF; Vandewalle E; Stalmans I
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e499-e505. PubMed ID: 30345638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.