BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

352 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20232453)

  • 1. Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
    Razek AA; Gaballa G; Denewer A; Nada N
    NMR Biomed; 2010 Jul; 23(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 20232453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
    Kim SH; Cha ES; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jung JH; Park YG; Suh YJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):615-20. PubMed ID: 19711411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Proliferation index and its prognostic value in invasive ductal breast carcinoma].
    Falco M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2009; 55(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 20349588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
    Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Jeh SK; Kim SH; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 21182127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI: predicting axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.
    Chung J; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Kim EK; Ryu YH; Son EJ
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):909-16. PubMed ID: 24234236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer.
    Liu Y; Bai R; Sun H; Liu H; Wang D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):858-62. PubMed ID: 19940650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio between axillary lymph node with primary tumor to detect nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients.
    Luo N; Su D; Jin G; Liu L; Zhu X; Xie D; Liu Y
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):824-8. PubMed ID: 23440958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment results and prognostic factors of early breast cancer treated with a breast conserving operation and radiotherapy.
    Kim KJ; Huh SJ; Yang JH; Park W; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Lee JH; Kang SS; Lee JE; Kang MK; Park YJ; Nam HR
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Mar; 35(3):126-33. PubMed ID: 15741302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mediastinal lymph nodes: assessment with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
    Koşucu P; Tekinbaş C; Erol M; Sari A; Kavgaci H; Oztuna F; Ersöz S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 19629990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.
    Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Estabrook A; Gistrak MA; Jaffer S; Bleiweiss IJ
    J Surg Oncol; 2002 May; 80(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11967899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prognostic significance of the percentage of positive/dissected axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer recurrence and survival in patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes.
    Truong PT; Berthelet E; Lee J; Kader HA; Olivotto IA
    Cancer; 2005 May; 103(10):2006-14. PubMed ID: 15812825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes.
    Holzapfel K; Duetsch S; Fauser C; Eiber M; Rummeny EJ; Gaa J
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 18995981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative study on clinical and pathological changes of liver fibrosis with diffusion-weighted imaging].
    Zhou ML; Yan FH; Xu PJ; Chen CZ; Shen JZ; Li RC; Ji Y; Shi JY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 89(25):1757-61. PubMed ID: 19862980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Apparent diffusion coefficient value in invasive ductal carcinoma at 3.0 Tesla: is it correlated with prognostic factors?
    Guvenc I; Akay S; Ince S; Yildiz R; Kilbas Z; Oysul FG; Tasar M
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20150614. PubMed ID: 26853508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Related Apparent Diffusion Coefficient be a Prognostic Value in Women With Breast Cancer?
    Rabasco P; Caivano R; Simeon V; Dinardo G; Lotumolo A; Gioioso M; Villonio A; Iannelli G; D'Antuono F; Zandolino A; Macarini L; Guglielmi G; Cammarota A
    Cancer Invest; 2017 Feb; 35(2):92-99. PubMed ID: 28107084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer.
    Fornasa F; Nesoti MV; Bovo C; Bonavina MG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Oct; 36(4):858-64. PubMed ID: 22648570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Important histologic outcome predictors for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
    Hasebe T; Iwasaki M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Hojo T; Shibata T; Kinoshita T; Tsuda H
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Oct; 35(10):1484-97. PubMed ID: 21881484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
    Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.