These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20232665)

  • 1. Were nurses responsible for injury from infiltrating i.v.? Case on point: Graves v. Breakwood Health Services, Inc., (12/18/2009)-AL So.3d.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Feb; 50(9):4. PubMed ID: 20232665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Injection technique: R.N. expert opinion. Case in point: Tripp v. Humana, Inc. (474 So. 2d 88 - AL).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Oct; 26(5):2. PubMed ID: 3852349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CA: Did RN fail to document or monitor i.v.?: Nonsuit for lack of Dr.'s testimony re causation. Galvez v. Loma Linda University Medical Center, E047803 CAAPP4-2 (5/6/2010)-CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Aug; 51(3):3. PubMed ID: 21105314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Witness for the prosecution.
    Condliffe B
    Nurs Times; 2001 Jul 19-25; 97(29):26-7. PubMed ID: 11957499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurse's expert opinion on 'causation' o.k. for pre suit purpose. Case on point: Apostolico v Orlando Regional Health Care System, 871 So.2d 283--FL (2004).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Sep; 45(4):2. PubMed ID: 15537117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' word v. nurse's word: documentation. Case in point: Sheppard v. Kimbrough (318 S.E. 2d - SC).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Nov; 25(6):4. PubMed ID: 6568727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The nurse's role as an expert witness.
    Fiesta J
    Nurs Manage; 1991 Mar; 22(3):28-9. PubMed ID: 2002942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The nurse as an expert witness.
    Creighton H
    Nurs Manage; 1988 Aug; 19(8):22-3. PubMed ID: 3399203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A malpractice lawsuit simulation: critical care providers learn as participants in a mock trial.
    Jenkins RC; Lemak CH
    Crit Care Nurse; 2009 Aug; 29(4):52-60. PubMed ID: 19648598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Must nurse expert have recent hands-on experience? Case on point: Baptist Medical Center of Beaches, Inc. v. Rhodin, 1D10-859 (7/16/2010)-FL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Sep; 51(4):4. PubMed ID: 20954519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RN not at fault for failure to give epinephrin. Taylor v. Jackson-Madison Cnty. Gen. Hosp., No.W2005-02471-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. App. 8/23/06) -Tn.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Oct; 47(5):2. PubMed ID: 17117601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gauze pad left in pt. during reversal of tubal ligation surgery. Case on point: Houserman v. Garrett, 2004 WL 2829112.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Dec; 45(7):4. PubMed ID: 15675762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MI: court OKs nurse's affidavit re nursing: medical expert's affidavit required for causation.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 May; 47(12):3. PubMed ID: 17605183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plastic cup on i.v. site: nurse-expert testimony. Case in point: Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (596 N.E. 2d 1110-OH [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):4. PubMed ID: 1494665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Must nurses perform tests not ordered? Case in point: Northeast Ala. Reg. Med. Ctr. v. Owens (584 So. 2d 1360--AL (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Dec; 32(7):4. PubMed ID: 1767027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Was there sufficient nurse expert testimony to go to a jury? Case on point: Nichols v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 2004 WL 2222384 -CA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2004 Oct; 45(5):2. PubMed ID: 15559717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurses cause 7-hour delay in treatment of cardiac patient. CASE ON POINT: Hillcrest Baptist Medical Center v. Wade, 2005 WL 1837004 S.W.3d TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Aug; 46(3):2. PubMed ID: 16184883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RN's expert testimony not 'required'--not 'barred'. Case on point: Davis v. Montgomery Cnty. Mem. Hosp., No. 6-086/05 (Iowa app. 07/12/2006)-IA.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Jul; 47(2):2. PubMed ID: 16937912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nurse gives nitro w/o orders: undiagnosed cardiac Pt. dies. CASE ON POINT: Michael v. Medical Staffing Network, Inc., 947 So.2d 614 -FL (2007).
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2007 Sep; 48(4):2. PubMed ID: 17941414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.