These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20233129)

  • 1. Assessment of optical localizer accuracy for computer aided surgery systems.
    Elfring R; de la Fuente M; Radermacher K
    Comput Aided Surg; 2010; 15(1-3):1-12. PubMed ID: 20233129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three optical tracking systems in a complex navigation scenario.
    Rudolph T; Ebert L; Kowal J
    Comput Aided Surg; 2010; 15(4-6):104-9. PubMed ID: 21070180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring the positional accuracy of computer assisted surgical tracking systems.
    Clarke JV; Deakin AH; Nicol AC; Picard F
    Comput Aided Surg; 2010; 15(1-3):13-8. PubMed ID: 20433317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy assessment of image-guided implant surgery: an experimental study.
    Hoffmann J; Westendorff C; Schneider M; Reinert S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15973949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of acquisition of an imageless computer-assisted system and its implication for knee arthroplasty.
    Lustig S; Fleury C; Goy D; Neyret P; Donell ST
    Knee; 2011 Jan; 18(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 20060724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Computer-assisted video-endoscopic endonasal surgery].
    Schmerber S; Chen B; Lavallée S; Coulomb M; Chirossel JP; Lavieille JP; Reyt E
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2001 Feb; 118(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 11240435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A theoretical comparison of 2-camera and 3-camera optical localizers with active or passive instrumentation.
    Faul I
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 50():284-90. PubMed ID: 10180555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided navigation for arthroscopic hip surgery using encoder linkages for position tracking.
    Monahan E; Shimada K
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Sep; 2(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 17520642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology.
    Schmerber S; Chassat F
    Comput Aided Surg; 2001; 6(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11335954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
    Bové JC
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems.
    Khadem R; Yeh CC; Sadeghi-Tehrani M; Bax MR; Johnson JA; Welch JN; Wilkinson EP; Shahidi R
    Comput Aided Surg; 2000; 5(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 10862132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [LED autoregistration in navigated endonasal sinus surgery].
    Arapakis I; Hubbe U; Maier W; Laszig R; Schipper J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Jun; 84(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 15940573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The research on accuracy of computer-assisted surgery].
    Sun JA; Qin BJ; Zhuang TG
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2002 Nov; 26(6):414-7. PubMed ID: 16104318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining the presence of bias error using statistical methods.
    Kwartowitz DM; Galloway RL; Shiavi RG
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Jan; 13(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 19129017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Six sigma analysis of computer-assisted surgery tracking protocols in TKA.
    Stiehl JB; Heck DA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():105-10. PubMed ID: 17632418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems--exemplified on the Vicon-460 system.
    Windolf M; Götzen N; Morlock M
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2776-80. PubMed ID: 18672241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upgrade of an optical navigation system with a permanent electromagnetic position control: a first step towards "navigated control" for liver surgery.
    Beller S; Eulenstein S; Lange T; Hünerbein M; Schlag PM
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2009; 16(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 19183828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Error analysis for determination of accuracy of an ultrasound navigation system for head and neck surgery.
    Kozak J; Krysztoforski K; Kroll T; Helbig S; Helbig M
    Comput Aided Surg; 2009; 14(4-6):69-82. PubMed ID: 20121587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of optical and electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation systems for fluoroscopic targeting.
    Ricci WM; Russell TA; Kahler DM; Terrill-Grisoni L; Culley P
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Mar; 22(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 18317053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.