224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20233509)
1. Cost-effectiveness of erlotinib versus docetaxel for second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the United Kingdom.
Lewis G; Peake M; Aultman R; Gyldmark M; Morlotti L; Creeden J; de la Orden M
J Int Med Res; 2010; 38(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 20233509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information of Erlotinib, Afatinib, and Cisplatin-Pemetrexed for First-Line Treatment of Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
Ting J; Tien Ho P; Xiang P; Sugay A; Abdel-Sattar M; Wilson L
Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):774-82. PubMed ID: 26409604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Erlotinib or docetaxel for second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cromwell I; van der Hoek K; Melosky B; Peacock S
J Thorac Oncol; 2011 Dec; 6(12):2097-103. PubMed ID: 22052223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Costs and clinical outcomes among patients with second-line non-small cell lung cancer in the outpatient community setting.
Nadler E; Forsyth M; Satram-Hoang S; Reyes C
J Thorac Oncol; 2012 Jan; 7(1):212-8. PubMed ID: 22124474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Erlotinib for the treatment of relapsed non-small cell lung cancer.
McLeod C; Bagust A; Boland A; Hockenhull J; Dundar Y; Proudlove C; Davis H; Green J; Macbeth F; Stevenson J; Walley T; Dickson R
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():41-7. PubMed ID: 19567213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review of economic evaluations in second and later lines of therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
Jäkel A; Plested M; Dharamshi K; Modha R; Bridge S; Johns A
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Feb; 11(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 23329379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Erlotinib and gefitinib for treating non-small cell lung cancer that has progressed following prior chemotherapy (review of NICE technology appraisals 162 and 175): a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Boland A; Dwan K; Beale S; Hockenhull J; Proudlove C; Dundar Y; Richardson M; Dickson R; Mullard A; Marshall E
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jun; 19(47):1-134. PubMed ID: 26134145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The potential clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacogenomic approaches to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Carlson JJ; Garrison LP; Ramsey SD; Veenstra DL
Value Health; 2009; 12(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 18647257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of erlotinib versus gefitinib in first-line treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-activating mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients in Hong Kong.
Lee VW; Schwander B; Lee VH
Hong Kong Med J; 2014 Jun; 20(3):178-86. PubMed ID: 24281768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Budget impact of erlotinib for maintenance therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Carlson JJ; Wong WB; Veenstra DL; Reyes C
J Med Econ; 2011; 14(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 21288059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-minimisation analysis of erlotinib in the second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Brazilian perspective.
Doral Stefani S; Giorgio Saggia M; Vicino dos Santos EA
J Med Econ; 2008; 11(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 19450094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic analysis: randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Bradbury PA; Tu D; Seymour L; Isogai PK; Zhu L; Ng R; Mittmann N; Tsao MS; Evans WK; Shepherd FA; Leighl NB;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Mar; 102(5):298-306. PubMed ID: 20160168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial.
Garassino MC; Martelli O; Broggini M; Farina G; Veronese S; Rulli E; Bianchi F; Bettini A; Longo F; Moscetti L; Tomirotti M; Marabese M; Ganzinelli M; Lauricella C; Labianca R; Floriani I; Giaccone G; Torri V; Scanni A; Marsoni S;
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Sep; 14(10):981-8. PubMed ID: 23883922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Erlotinib or best supportive care for third-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a real-world cost-effectiveness analysis.
Cromwell I; van der Hoek K; Malfair Taylor SC; Melosky B; Peacock S
Lung Cancer; 2012 Jun; 76(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 22226627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-utility and budget impact analyses of gefitinib in second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer from Thai payer perspective.
Thongprasert S; Tinmanee S; Permsuwan U
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2012 Mar; 8(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 22369444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative clinical and economic outcomes of treatments for refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Carlson JJ; Reyes C; Oestreicher N; Lubeck D; Ramsey SD; Veenstra DL
Lung Cancer; 2008 Sep; 61(3):405-15. PubMed ID: 18295368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcome and economic implications of proteomic test-guided second- or third-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: extended analysis of the PROSE trial.
Hornberger J; Hirsch FR; Li Q; Page RD
Lung Cancer; 2015 May; 88(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 25804732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Araújo A, et al. An economic analysis of erlotinib, docetaxel, pemetrexed and best supportive care as second or third line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Rev Port Pneumol 2008; 14(6):803-827.
Bartminski W
Rev Port Pneumol; 2009; 15(3):555-9; author reply 560-6. PubMed ID: 19526635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: impact on the budget of a U.S. health insurance plan.
Ramsey SD; Clarke L; Kamath TV; Lubeck D
J Manag Care Pharm; 2006; 12(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 16925455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: an economic, randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial comparing docetaxel and pemetrexed: the GFPC 05-06 study.
Vergnenegre A; Corre R; Berard H; Paillotin D; Dujon C; Robinet G; Crequit J; Bota S; Thomas P; Chouaid C;
J Thorac Oncol; 2011 Jan; 6(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 21150465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
