187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20233534)
1. Comparison of anastomotic leakage and stricture formation following layered and stapler oesophagogastric anastomosis for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Zhang YS; Gao BR; Wang HJ; Su YF; Yang YZ; Zhang JH; Wang C
J Int Med Res; 2010; 38(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 20233534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical application of layered anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.
Zhu ZJ; Zhao YF; Chen LQ; Hu Y; Liu LX; Wang Y; Kou YL
World J Surg; 2008 Apr; 32(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 18210181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Hsu HH; Chen JS; Huang PM; Lee JM; Lee YC
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.
Takeyoshi I; Ohwada S; Ogawa T; Kawashima Y; Ohya T; Kawate S; Arai K; Nakasone Y; Morishita Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(34):1026-9. PubMed ID: 11020870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses.
Craig SR; Walker WS; Cameron EW; Wightman AJ
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1996 Feb; 41(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 8930036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sutures, staplers, leaks and strictures. A review of anastomoses in oesophageal resection at Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast 1977-1986.
McManus KG; Ritchie AJ; McGuigan J; Stevenson HM; Gibbons JR
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1990; 4(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 2184859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of outcomes following end-to-end hand-sewn and mechanical oesophagogastric anastomosis after oesophagectomy for carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Liu QX; Qiu Y; Deng XF; Min JX; Dai JG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Mar; 47(3):e118-23. PubMed ID: 25475947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Hayata K; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Ojima T; Iwahashi M; Katsuda M; Tsuji T; Kato T; Kitadani J; Takeuchi A; Tabata H; Yamaue H
Surgery; 2017 Jul; 162(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 28318550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Law S; Fok M; Chu KM; Wong J
Ann Surg; 1997 Aug; 226(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 9296510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early and late surgical complications of subtotal oesophagectomy for squamous carcinoma of the oesophagus.
Griffin SM; Woods SD; Chan A; Chung SC; Li AK
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1991 Jun; 36(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 1920231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Luechakiettisak P; Kasetsunthorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture.
Wong J; Cheung H; Lui R; Fan YW; Smith A; Siu KF
Surgery; 1987 Apr; 101(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 3563886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel technique for cervical gastro-oesophageal anastomosis during minimally invasive oesophagectomy.
Wang ZQ; Jiang YQ; Xu W; Cai HR; Zhang Z; Yin Z; Zhang Q
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():221-229. PubMed ID: 29609046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research.
Valverde A; Hay JM; Fingerhut A; Elhadad A
Surgery; 1996 Sep; 120(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 8784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The application of stapling device in surgery of carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia].
Zhou NK; Liu X; Liang CY; Tian XD; Liu Y; Yuan Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 86(21):1450-2. PubMed ID: 16842694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.
Lam TC; Fok M; Cheng SW; Wong J
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Aug; 104(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 1495302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and manual cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Cayi R; Li M; Xiong G; Cai K; Wang W
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):908-9. PubMed ID: 22699083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
