207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20233549)
1. Relevance of doubtful ("equivocal") late patch-test readings.
Carlson S; Gipson K; Nedorost S
Dermatitis; 2010; 21(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 20233549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contact hypersensitivity to epoxy resin, methyldibromoglutaronitrile, tixocortol pivalate and budesonide in Hungary: a study in 1448 patients.
Pónyai G; Németh I; Husz S; Jurcsik A; Nebenführer L; Dinnyés M; Némethy P; Kohánka V; Temesvári E
G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2011 Feb; 146(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 21317857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: the Mayo Clinic experience.
Davis MD; Bhate K; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Richardson DM; Weaver AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18513826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The importance of checking for delayed reactions in pediatric patch testing.
Matiz C; Russell K; Jacob SE
Pediatr Dermatol; 2011; 28(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 21208272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of a second patch test reading of TRUE Tests® on D6/7.
Madsen JT; Andersen KE
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Feb; 68(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 23289880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concordance of patch test results with four new TRUE test allergens compared with the same allergens from Chemotechnique.
Andersen KE; Paulsen E
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jan; 60(1):59. PubMed ID: 19125728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends in patch-test results and allergen changes in the standard series: a Mayo Clinic 5-year retrospective review (January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2010).
Wentworth AB; Yiannias JA; Keeling JH; Hall MR; Camilleri MJ; Drage LA; Torgerson RR; Fett DD; Prakash AV; Scalf LA; Allen EM; Johnson JS; Singh N; Nordberg Linehan DL; Killian JM; Davis MD
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2014 Feb; 70(2):269-75.e4. PubMed ID: 24268786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low yield for extended reading of patch tests with topical corticosteroids.
Davis MD; Richardson DM; Farmer SA
Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 16(3):124-6. PubMed ID: 16242083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Late patch-test reactions to budesonide need not be a sign of sensitization induced by the test procedure.
Isaksson M; Bruze M
Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Sep; 14(3):154-6. PubMed ID: 14744407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acrylate contact allergy: patient characteristics and evaluation of screening allergens.
Drucker AM; Pratt MD
Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 21504694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens.
Brasch J; Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Dec; 12(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 11753892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema.
Moustafa M; Holden CR; Athavale P; Cork MJ; Messenger AG; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Oct; 65(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 21504435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008.
Fransway AF; Zug KA; Belsito DV; Deleo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM; Dekoven J; Zirwas M
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 23340394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix.
Devos SA; Constandt L; Tupker RA; Noz KC; Lucker GP; Bruynzeel DP; Schuttelaar ML; Kruyswijk MR; van Zuuren EJ; Vink J; Coenraads PJ; Kiemeney LA; van der Valk PG
Dermatitis; 2008; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18346396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician-patient agreement in the assessment of allergen relevance.
Gipson KA; Carlson SW; Nedorost ST
Dermatitis; 2010; 21(5):275-9. PubMed ID: 20920414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The benefit of late readings in patch testing depends both on allergen and patient characteristics.
Forkel S; Schubert S; Dickel H; Gina M; Schröder-Kraft C; Vieluf D; Brans R; Kreft B; Wurpts G; Geier J; Buhl T
Allergy; 2022 May; 77(5):1477-1485. PubMed ID: 34687560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Late reactions in patch tests: a 4-year review from a clinic of occupational dermatology.
Aalto-Korte K; Alanko K; Kuuliala O; Jolanki R
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 17244075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
