144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20233801)
21. Reach of the Montana Cancer Control Program to Women with Disabilities.
Froehlich-Grobe K; Shropshire WC; Zimmerman H; Van Brunt J; Betts A
J Community Health; 2016 Jun; 41(3):650-7. PubMed ID: 26699150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Delays in Follow-up Care for Abnormal Mammograms in Mobile Mammography Versus Fixed-Clinic Patients.
Vang SS; Dunn A; Margolies LR; Jandorf L
J Gen Intern Med; 2022 May; 37(7):1619-1625. PubMed ID: 35212876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Lasting Effects of the Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on Breast Cancer Detection and Outcomes, Ohio, 2000-2009.
Koroukian SM; Bakaki PM; Han X; Schluchter M; Owusu C; Cooper GS; Flocke SA
Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jul; 12():E116. PubMed ID: 26203814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, Medicaid, and breast cancer outcomes among Ohio's underserved women.
Koroukian SM; Bakaki PM; Htoo PT; Han X; Schluchter M; Owusu C; Cooper GS; Rose J; Flocke SA
Cancer; 2017 Aug; 123(16):3097-3106. PubMed ID: 28542870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?
Taplin SH; Ichikawa L; Yood MU; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Mouchawar J; Leyden WA; Altaras R; Beverly RK; Casso D; Westbrook EO; Bischoff K; Zapka JG; Barlow WE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1518-27. PubMed ID: 15494602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. From cancer screening to treatment: service delivery and referral in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Miller JW; Hanson V; Johnson GD; Royalty JE; Richardson LC
Cancer; 2014 Aug; 120 Suppl 16(0 16):2549-56. PubMed ID: 25099897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A 10-Year Evaluation of New Jersey's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: Comparison of Stage at Diagnosis in Enrollees and Nonenrollees.
Jerome-D'Emilia B; Suplee P; Kushary D
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Feb; 29(2):230-236. PubMed ID: 31436495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the USA: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998-2012.
Howard DH; Tangka FK; Royalty J; Dalzell LP; Miller J; O'Hara B; Joseph K; Kenney K; Guy G; Hall IJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2015 May; 26(5):657-68. PubMed ID: 25779379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Barriers to diagnostic resolution after abnormal mammography: a review of the literature.
Wujcik D; Fair AM
Cancer Nurs; 2008; 31(5):E16-30. PubMed ID: 18772653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on cervical cancer mortality among uninsured low-income women in the U.S., 1991-2007.
Ekwueme DU; Uzunangelov VJ; Hoerger TJ; Miller JW; Saraiya M; Benard VB; Hall IJ; Royalty J; Li C; Myers ER
Am J Prev Med; 2014 Sep; 47(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 25015564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors associated with repeat mammography in a New York State public health screening program.
Evans JL; Nasca PC; Baptiste MS; Lillquist PP; Stoddard AM; True SJ; Tuthill RW
J Public Health Manag Pract; 1998 Sep; 4(5):63-71. PubMed ID: 10187068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal mammograms.
McCarthy BD; Yood MU; Boohaker EA; Ward RE; Rebner M; Johnson CC
Am J Prev Med; 1996; 12(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 8874693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Overcoming Barriers to Mammography Screening: A Quasi-randomised Pragmatic Trial in a Community-based Primary Care Setting.
Seetoh T; Siew WF; Koh A; Liau WF; Koh GC; Lee JJ; Wong ML; Seow A
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2014 Dec; 43(12):588-94. PubMed ID: 25588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Short report: Limited effectiveness of screening mammography in addition to clinical breast examination by trained nurse midwives in rural Jakarta, Indonesia.
Kardinah D; Anderson BO; Duggan C; Ali IA; Thomas DB
Int J Cancer; 2014 Mar; 134(5):1250-5. PubMed ID: 24037942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial.
Kiefe CI; McKay SV; Halevy A; Brody BA
Arch Intern Med; 1994 Jun; 154(11):1217-24. PubMed ID: 8203989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Time to follow-up of an abnormal mammogram in women with diabetes: a population-based study.
Habeeb SY; Fung K; Fischer HD; Austin PC; Paszat L; Lipscombe LL
Cancer Med; 2016 Nov; 5(11):3292-3299. PubMed ID: 27709838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".
Caplan LS; Blackman D; Nadel M; Monticciolo DL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 9930778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast cancer rescreening in low-income women.
Song L; Fletcher R
Am J Prev Med; 1998 Aug; 15(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 9713668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
