147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20233819)
1. Liquid-based cytology vs conventional cytology in detecting cervical cancer.
Saraiya M; Benard V; Miller J
JAMA; 2010 Mar; 303(11):1034; author reply 1034-5. PubMed ID: 20233819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Liquid-based cytology for cervical screening.
Blamey S; Jackson T; Robinson J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):70-1; author reply 71-2. PubMed ID: 16441706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Clelland CA
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):134-5. PubMed ID: 11952755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Imrie JE; Gardiner DS; Wilson A
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 11952754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Moseley R
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 11952756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Linder J
Cytopathology; 2002 Feb; 13(1):66. PubMed ID: 11985572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Liquid-based cytology - an alternative international view.
Broadstock M
Cytopathology; 2001 Jun; 12(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 11380554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Our experience in using liquid based cytology in cervical screening (LBC)].
Tsonev A; Ivanov S; Kovachev E; Kornovski Y; Ismail E
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2013; 52 Suppl 1():8-10. PubMed ID: 24294738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears? Authors' reply.
Herbert A; Johnson J
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):133. PubMed ID: 11952753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Liquid based cytology: a new cervical screening system for the UK.
Wall A
J Fam Health Care; 2005; 15(3):90-2. PubMed ID: 16094904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of organized versus opportunistic cervical cytology screening in Hong Kong.
Kim JJ; Leung GM; Woo PP; Goldie SJ
J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 15284314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the sensitivity of cervical cytology: what are the issues?
Myers ER
Am J Manag Care; 2000 Jul; 6(7):838-40. PubMed ID: 11067380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Liquid-based cytology: under scrutiny down-under.
Leiman G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jul; 35(7):379-80. PubMed ID: 17580350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening.
Bentz JS
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2005 Nov; 5(6):857-71. PubMed ID: 16255628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scan-and-treat methodology using Azure A fast stain as a cost-effective cervical cancer screening alternative to visual inspection with acetic acid.
Guillaud M; Benedet JL; Follen M; Crain BT; MacAulay C
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S256-9. PubMed ID: 17825881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Liquid-based cytology: is this the way forward for cervical screening?
Moseley RP; Paget S
Cytopathology; 2002 Apr; 13(2):71-82. PubMed ID: 11952745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical screening in older women.
Ogilvie D
Cytopathology; 2002 Oct; 13(5):333. PubMed ID: 12421452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening.
Bidus MA; Maxwell GL; Kulasingam S; Rose GS; Elkas JC; Chernofsky M; Myers ER
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 107(5):997-1005. PubMed ID: 16648402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
