These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20234016)

  • 1. When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Aron A
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Apr; 38(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 20234016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.
    Congleton AR; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):535-51. PubMed ID: 21744986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research.
    Conte N; Pelegrina S; Padulo C; Marascia E; Fairfield B
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jun; 88(4):1339-1351. PubMed ID: 38466389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Functioning of memory in subjects with autism].
    Gras-Vincendon A; Bursztejn C; Danion JM
    Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 19081450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory.
    Barber SJ; Harris CB; Rajaram S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 25068855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differentiating the DF effect in episodic memory: evaluating the contribution of the procedures of collaborative memory.
    Nie A; Guo B
    J Gen Psychol; 2024; 151(3):223-270. PubMed ID: 37671532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective attention and the three-process memory model for the interpretation of verbal free recall in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
    Christidi F; Zalonis I; Smyrnis N; Evdokimidis I
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2012 Sep; 18(5):809-18. PubMed ID: 22676844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Collaborative remembering revisited: Study context access modulates collaborative inhibition and later benefits for individual memory.
    Abel M; Bäuml KT
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1319-1334. PubMed ID: 28770540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of deep encoding in Alzheimer disease. Analysis of performance on a memory task using the Item Specific Deficit Approach.
    Oltra-Cucarella J; Pérez-Elvira R; Duque P
    Neurologia; 2014 Jun; 29(5):286-93. PubMed ID: 24035297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collaboration in implicit memory: evidence from word-fragment completion and category exemplar generation.
    Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Rezende Silva Marques V; Bechi Gabrielli G; Spataro P
    Psychol Res; 2017 Jan; 81(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 26612200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Creation and normalisation of a verbal episodic memory task in elderly adults: "GERIA-12"].
    Vandenberghe M; Michiels J; Vanderaspoilden V; Claes T; Fery P
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 2015 Dec; 171(12):853-65. PubMed ID: 26563664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of controlled encoding and retrieval facilitation on memory performance in patients with different profiles of mild cognitive impairment.
    Perri R; Monaco M; Fadda L; Serra L; Marra C; Caltagirone C; Bruni AC; Curcio S; Bozzali M; Carlesimo GA
    J Neurol; 2015; 262(4):938-48. PubMed ID: 25670528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for impaired encoding and retrieval memory profiles in Parkinson disease.
    Weintraub D; Moberg PJ; Culbertson WC; Duda JE; Stern MB
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 15622014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shared encoding and the costs and benefits of collaborative recall.
    Harris CB; Barnier AJ; Sutton J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 22686851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning and Remembering with Others: The Key Role of Retrieval in Shaping Group Recall and Collective Memory.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Fox EB
    Soc Cogn; 2012; 30(1):121-132. PubMed ID: 25431516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory evaluation with a new cued recall test in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
    Ivanoiu A; Adam S; Van der Linden M; Salmon E; Juillerat AC; Mulligan R; Seron X
    J Neurol; 2005 Jan; 252(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15654553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for impaired mnemonic strategy use among patients with schizophrenia using the part-list cuing paradigm.
    Christensen BK; Girard TA; Benjamin AS; Vidailhet P
    Schizophr Res; 2006 Jul; 85(1-3):1-11. PubMed ID: 16632330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaborative remembering in older adults: age-invariant outcomes in the context of episodic recall deficits.
    Henkel LA; Rajaram S
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Sep; 26(3):532-545. PubMed ID: 21463054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of similarity on environmental context cueing.
    Smith SM; Handy JD; Angello G; Manzano I
    Memory; 2014; 22(5):493-508. PubMed ID: 23721293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.