BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20234082)

  • 1. Interactions between sub-10-nm iron and cerium oxide nanoparticles and 3T3 fibroblasts: the role of the coating and aggregation state.
    Safi M; Sarrouj H; Sandre O; Mignet N; Berret JF
    Nanotechnology; 2010 Apr; 21(14):145103. PubMed ID: 20234082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the Synthesis Scheme of Nanocrystalline Cerium Oxide and Its Concentration on the Biological Activity of Cells Providing Wound Regeneration.
    Silina EV; Stupin VA; Manturova NE; Ivanova OS; Popov AL; Mysina EA; Artyushkova EB; Kryukov AA; Dodonova SA; Kruglova MP; Tinkov AA; Skalny AV; Ivanov VK
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Sep; 24(19):. PubMed ID: 37833949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unveiling the mechanism of uptake and sub-cellular distribution of cerium oxide nanoparticles.
    Singh S; Kumar A; Karakoti A; Seal S; Self WT
    Mol Biosyst; 2010 Oct; 6(10):1813-20. PubMed ID: 20697616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Colloidal stability and catalytic activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles in cell culture media.
    Ju X; Fučíková A; Šmíd B; Nováková J; Matolínová I; Matolín V; Janata M; Bělinová T; Hubálek Kalbáčová M
    RSC Adv; 2020 Oct; 10(65):39373-39384. PubMed ID: 35515371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cerium oxide nanoparticles improve cotton salt tolerance by enabling better ability to maintain cytosolic K
    Liu J; Li G; Chen L; Gu J; Wu H; Li Z
    J Nanobiotechnology; 2021 May; 19(1):153. PubMed ID: 34034767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Common trends in the epidemic of Covid-19 disease.
    Radiom M; Berret JF
    Eur Phys J Plus; 2020; 135(6):517. PubMed ID: 32834912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Macromolecules with Different Charges, Lengths, and Coordination Groups for the Coprecipitation Synthesis of Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as
    Tao C; Chen Y; Wang D; Cai Y; Zheng Q; An L; Lin J; Tian Q; Yang S
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2019 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 31060287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutagenic Effects of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Biological Cells.
    Dissanayake NM; Current KM; Obare SO
    Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Sep; 16(10):23482-516. PubMed ID: 26437397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Catalytic Properties and Biomedical Applications of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles.
    Walkey C; Das S; Seal S; Erlichman J; Heckman K; Ghibelli L; Traversa E; McGinnis JF; Self WT
    Environ Sci Nano; 2015 Feb; 2(1):33-53. PubMed ID: 26207185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shifts in oxidation states of cerium oxide nanoparticles detected inside intact hydrated cells and organelles.
    Szymanski CJ; Munusamy P; Mihai C; Xie Y; Hu D; Gilles MK; Tyliszczak T; Thevuthasan S; Baer DR; Orr G
    Biomaterials; 2015 Sep; 62():147-54. PubMed ID: 26056725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhancing therapeutic efficacy through designed aggregation of nanoparticles.
    Sadhukha T; Wiedmann TS; Panyam J
    Biomaterials; 2014 Sep; 35(27):7860-9. PubMed ID: 24947232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intracellular signal modulation by nanomaterials.
    Hussain S; Garantziotis S; Rodrigues-Lima F; Dupret JM; Baeza-Squiban A; Boland S
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 811():111-34. PubMed ID: 24683030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding the adsorption interface of polyelectrolyte coating on redox active nanoparticles using soft particle electrokinetics and its biological activity.
    Saraf S; Neal CJ; Das S; Barkam S; McCormack R; Seal S
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2014 Apr; 6(8):5472-82. PubMed ID: 24673655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface characterization of nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Important needs and challenging opportunities.
    Baer DR; Engelhard MH; Johnson GE; Laskin J; Lai J; Mueller K; Munusamy P; Thevuthasan S; Wang H; Washton N; Elder A; Baisch BL; Karakoti A; Kuchibhatla SV; Moon D
    J Vac Sci Technol A; 2013 Sep; 31(5):50820. PubMed ID: 24482557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of particle agglomeration on the formation of a surface-connected compartment induced by hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in human monocyte-derived macrophages.
    Müller KH; Motskin M; Philpott AJ; Routh AF; Shanahan CM; Duer MJ; Skepper JN
    Biomaterials; 2014 Jan; 35(3):1074-88. PubMed ID: 24183166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precise quantification of nanoparticle internalization.
    Gottstein C; Wu G; Wong BJ; Zasadzinski JA
    ACS Nano; 2013 Jun; 7(6):4933-45. PubMed ID: 23706031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visualization of internalization of functionalized cobalt ferrite nanoparticles and their intracellular fate.
    Bregar VB; Lojk J; Suštar V; Veranič P; Pavlin M
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2013; 8():919-31. PubMed ID: 23486857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preparation and Characterization Challenges to Understanding Environmental and Biological Impacts of Nanoparticles.
    Karakoti AS; Munusamy P; Hostetler K; Kodali V; Kuchibhatla S; Orr G; Pounds JG; Teeguarden JG; Thrall BD; Baer DR
    Surf Interface Anal; 2012 Aug; 44(5):882-889. PubMed ID: 23430137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cerium dioxide nanoparticles do not modulate the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in human monocytes.
    Hussain S; Al-Nsour F; Rice AB; Marshburn J; Ji Z; Zink JI; Yingling B; Walker NJ; Garantziotis S
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2012; 7():1387-97. PubMed ID: 22457596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adsorption and desorption characteristics of arsenic onto ceria nanoparticles.
    Feng Q; Zhang Z; Ma Y; He X; Zhao Y; Chai Z
    Nanoscale Res Lett; 2012 Jan; 7(1):84. PubMed ID: 22269298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.