531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2023444)
21. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H
Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to eight years.
Munro AI; Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Burr LH
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 8000606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis. A new generation tissue valve with excellent intermediate clinical performance.
Jamieson WR; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Gerein AN; Janusz MT; Tyers GF; Allen P
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Oct; 96(4):652-66. PubMed ID: 3172812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors affecting performance and thromboembolism after porcine xenograft cardiac valve replacement.
Geha AS; Hammond GL; Laks H; Stansel HC; Glenn WW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Mar; 83(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 7062749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Six-and-half years' experience with the St. Jude BioImplant porcine prosthesis.
Triggiani M; D'Ancona G; Nascimbene S; Benussi S; Donatelli F; Paolini G; Galli L; Grossi A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 9130121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Long-term performance of mitral valve bioprosthesis].
von Segesser LK; Enz R; Bauer E; Laske A; Carrel T; Gallino A; Turina M
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1990 Jul; 120(30):1098-101. PubMed ID: 2392660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance of a fabricated trileaflet porcine bioprosthesis. Midterm follow-up of the Hancock modified-orifice valve.
DiSesa VJ; Allred EN; Kowalker W; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ; Cohn LH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 3613620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical outcomes with the Hancock II bioprosthetic valve.
Masters RG; Haddad M; Pipe AL; Veinot JP; Mesana T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Sep; 78(3):832-6. PubMed ID: 15337001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Long-term results of porcine bioprosthetic valves].
Nakanishi K; Yokota Y; Ando F; Okamoto F; Ikeda T; Otani S; Sugita T; Oda K
Kyobu Geka; 1991 Sep; 44(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 1920997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position: ten-year follow-up in 589 patients.
Aupart MR; Sirinelli AL; Diemont FF; Meurisse YA; Dreyfus XB; Marchand MA
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Feb; 61(2):615-20. PubMed ID: 8572776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Early and late results with combined mitral and aortic valve replacement.
Matsuyoshi T; Kimura M; Tachikawa Y; Nakamura M; Iwakuma A; Morishige N; Nakamura K; Sukehiro S; Kawano Y; Anai K
Igaku Kenkyu; 1993 Sep; 63(3):85-94. PubMed ID: 8023654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early and late risk of aortic valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and tilting disc prosthetic aortic valves.
Cohn LH; Allred EN; DiSesa VJ; Sawtelle K; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):695-705. PubMed ID: 6492838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The porcine bioprosthetic valve. Twelve years later.
Magilligan DJ; Lewis JW; Tilley B; Peterson E
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Apr; 89(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 3982058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
