These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20234889)

  • 41. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy.
    Salvi GE; Brägger U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24 Suppl():69-85. PubMed ID: 19885435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study.
    Andersson B; Glauser R; Maglione M; Taylor A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 14714845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible.
    Cochran DL; Bosshardt DD; Grize L; Higginbottom FL; Jones AA; Jung RE; Wieland M; Dard M
    J Periodontol; 2009 Apr; 80(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 19335081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Changes in peri-implant tissues subjected to orthodontic forces and ligature breakdown in monkeys.
    Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kohal RJ; Rohde M; Strub JR; Teuscher U; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 9579628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Professional and patient-based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis.
    Dueled E; Gotfredsen K; Trab Damsgaard M; Hede B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):729-36. PubMed ID: 19515060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses.
    Goodacre CJ; Bernal G; Rungcharassaeng K; Kan JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 12886205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Peri-implant bone loss around single and multiple prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Firme CT; Vettore MV; Melo M; Vidigal GM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 24451857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review.
    Blanes RJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():67-72. PubMed ID: 19663952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of Crown to Implant Ratio and Anatomical Crown Length on Clinical Conditions in a Single Implant: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Sun SP; Moon IS; Park KH; Lee DW
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):724-31. PubMed ID: 24238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Impact of local and systemic factors on additional peri-implant bone loss.
    de Souza JG; Neto AR; Filho GS; Dalago HR; de Souza Júnior JM; Bianchini MA
    Quintessence Int; 2013 May; 44(5):415-24. PubMed ID: 23479580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support.
    Misch CE; Suzuki JB; Misch-Dietsh FM; Bidez MW
    Implant Dent; 2005 Jun; 14(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 15968181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of crown-to-implant ratio and crown height space on marginal bone stress: a finite element analysis.
    da Rocha Ferreira JJ; Machado LFM; Oliveira JM; Ramos JCT
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 Sep; 7(1):81. PubMed ID: 34467461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported prostheses? A systematic review.
    Fathi A; Rismanchian M; Khodadadi R; Dezaki SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):819-825. PubMed ID: 35469647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The investigation of the stress distribution in abutment teeth for connected crowns.
    Mizusawa K; Shin C; Okada D; Ogura R; Komada W; Saleh O; Huang L; Miura H
    J Dent Sci; 2021 Jul; 16(3):929-936. PubMed ID: 34141107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Subperiosteal implant prosthesis and case report].
    ZEMBILCI G
    Tip Fak Mecm; 1962; 25():84-90. PubMed ID: 14003456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Response to the "Letter to the Editor" regarding the article: Pellizzer EP, et al. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio in single crowns on clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:497-502.
    Gomes JML; Limírio JPJO; Lemos CAA; Moraes SLD; Minatel L; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):524-525. PubMed ID: 34839907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Important limitations in methods make systematic review assessing impact of crown-to-implant ratio on treatment complications not useful.
    Brignardello-Petersen R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2019 Apr; 150(4):e44. PubMed ID: 30593342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comments regarding: Pellizzer EP, Marcela de Luna Gomes J, Araújo Lemos CA, Minatel L, Justino de Oliveira Limírio JP, Dantas de Moraes SL. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio in single crowns on clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2021;126:497-502.
    Sadowsky SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):524. PubMed ID: 34836649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biomechanics and load resistance of short dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Hasan I; Bourauel C; Mundt T; Heinemann F
    ISRN Dent; 2013; 2013():424592. PubMed ID: 23738085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.