These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20235494)

  • 1. The homogeneity of audibility and prosody of Zulu words for speech reception threshold (SRT) testing.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Govender C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2009; 56():60-75. PubMed ID: 20235494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a Zulu speech reception threshold test for Zulu first language speakers in Kwa Zulu-Natal.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Govender C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2007; 54():111-22. PubMed ID: 18240666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometrically equivalent bisyllabic words for speech recognition threshold testing in Vietnamese.
    Harris RW; McPherson DL; Hanson CM; Eggett DL
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Aug; 56(8):525-537. PubMed ID: 28388853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digit speech reception threshold testing in Tswana/English speakers.
    Khoza K; Ramma L; Mophosho M; Moroka D
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2008; 55():20-8. PubMed ID: 19485066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a Mandarin monosyllable test material with homogenous items (I): homogeneity selection.
    Ji F; Xi X; Chen AT; Ying J; Wang QJ; Yang SM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 131(9):962-9. PubMed ID: 21534715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. First-language raters' opinions when validating word recordings for a newly developed speech reception threshold test.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Wilson W
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 Mar; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometrically equivalent Russian speech audiometry materials by male and female talkers.
    Harris RW; Nissen SL; Pola MG; McPherson DL; Tavartkiladze GA; Eggett DL
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 17365055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intonational differences between L1 and L2 english in South Africa.
    Swerts M; Zerbian S
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(3):127-46. PubMed ID: 20926913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting word-recognition performance in noise by young listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables.
    McArdle R; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):507-18. PubMed ID: 19253783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of speech reception threshold materials for speakers of Taiwan Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Slade KB
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):449-58. PubMed ID: 17654087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the South African Spondaic and CID W-1 wordlists for measuring speech recognition threshold.
    Hanekom T; Soer M; Pottas L
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2015 Jun; 62(1):E1-10. PubMed ID: 26304218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Analysis of disyllabic mandarin speech test results of normal hearing persons with different ages].
    Wang Y; Zhang H; Tong J; Guo J; Zheng Z; Wu W; Chen J; Li Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(7):312-5. PubMed ID: 22737873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometrically equivalent trisyllabic words for speech reception threshold testing in Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Jennings LJ; Eggett DL; Buck H
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Jul; 44(7):391-9. PubMed ID: 16136789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry.
    Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the prosody of Orkney and Shetland dialects.
    Leyden Kv; van Heuven VJ
    Phonetica; 2006; 63(2-3):149-74. PubMed ID: 17028460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance/intensity function: an underused resource.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):479-91. PubMed ID: 18469711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a Mandarin tone identification test: sensitivity index d' as a performance measure for individual tones.
    Krenmayr A; Qi B; Liu B; Liu H; Chen X; Han D; Schatzer R; Zierhofer CM
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 21091262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.