867 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20235897)
1. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
Bjørstad AR; Irgens-Hansen K; Daltveit AK; Irgens LM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 20235897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal macrosomia in home and birth center births in the United States: Maternal, fetal, and newborn outcomes.
Pillai S; Cheyney M; Everson CL; Bovbjerg ML
Birth; 2020 Dec; 47(4):409-417. PubMed ID: 33058197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Macrosomia in 23 developing countries: an analysis of a multicountry, facility-based, cross-sectional survey.
Koyanagi A; Zhang J; Dagvadorj A; Hirayama F; Shibuya K; Souza JP; Gülmezoglu AM
Lancet; 2013 Feb; 381(9865):476-83. PubMed ID: 23290494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing macrosomia-related birth complications in primigravid women: ultrasound- and magnetic resonance imaging-based models.
Badr DA; Cannie MM; Kadji C; Kang X; Carlin A; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 230(5):557.e1-557.e8. PubMed ID: 37827273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience.
Lipscomb KR; Gregory K; Shaw K
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 7898833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher risk for adverse obstetric outcomes among immigrants of African and Asian descent: a comparison study at a low-risk maternity hospital in Norway.
Bakken KS; Skjeldal OH; Stray-Pedersen B
Birth; 2015 Jun; 42(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 25847218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjaerven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1642-51. PubMed ID: 25100277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vacuum extraction in fetal macrosomia and risk of neonatal complications: a population-based cohort study.
Åberg K; Norman M; Pettersson K; Ekéus C
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Oct; 95(10):1089-96. PubMed ID: 27472147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of second delivery after prior macrosomic infant in women with normal glucose tolerance.
Mahony R; Walsh C; Foley ME; Daly L; O'Herlihy C
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):857-62. PubMed ID: 16582123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Delivery of macrosomic babies: management and outcomes of 330 cases.
Lim JH; Tan BC; Jammal AE; Symonds EM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 12521456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Twin births: cesarean section or vaginal delivery?
Hoffmann E; Oldenburg A; Rode L; Tabor A; Rasmussen S; Skibsted L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Apr; 91(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 22432546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The association between persistent occiput posterior position and neonatal outcomes.
Cheng YW; Shaffer BL; Caughey AB
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 16582120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal macrosomia: obstetric outcome of 311 cases in UNTH, Enugu, Nigeria.
Ezegwui HU; Ikeako LC; Egbuji C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2011; 14(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 22037078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors].
Schmitz T
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1261-71. PubMed ID: 26530180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery.
Schmitz T; Carnavalet Cde C; Azria E; Lopez E; Cabrol D; Goffinet F
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 111(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 18310373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Birth complications, overweight, and physical inactivity.
Voldner N; Frøslie KF; Haakstad LA; Bø K; Henriksen T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 19277916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetric and neonatal characteristics of pregnancy and delivery for infant birthweight ≥5.0 kg.
Crosby DA; Ahmed S; Razley A; Morrison JJ
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(24):2961-2965. PubMed ID: 27923280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When is fetal macrosomia (> or = 4500 g) an indication for caesarean section?
Mikulandra F; Perisa M; Stojnić E
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1996; 118(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 8794545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
