These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20236331)
1. Assessment of the risk of perforation of the mandibular canal by implant drill using density and thickness parameters. Başa O; Dilek OC Gerodontology; 2011 Sep; 28(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 20236331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study. Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study. Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation. Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation of mandibular bone quality with neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Yoshioka I; Tanaka T; Khanal A; Habu M; Kito S; Kodama M; Oda M; Wakasugi-Sato N; Matsumoto-Takeda S; Seta Y; Tominaga K; Sakoda S; Morimoto Y Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 49(7):552-6. PubMed ID: 21071118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic considerations for the regional anatomy in the posterior mandible. Yashar N; Engeland CG; Rosenfeld AL; Walsh TP; Califano JV J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 21542732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between inferior alveolar nerve canal position at mandibular second molar in patients with prognathism and possible occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Yoshioka I; Tanaka T; Khanal A; Habu M; Kito S; Kodama M; Oda M; Wakasugi-Sato N; Matsumoto-Takeda S; Fukai Y; Tokitsu T; Tomikawa M; Seta Y; Tominaga K; Morimoto Y J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 68(12):3022-7. PubMed ID: 20739116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect compressive injury to the inferior alveolar nerve caused by dental implant placement. Park YT; Kim SG; Moon SY J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e258-9. PubMed ID: 22305870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The spatial location of the mandibular canal in Chinese: a CT study. Nagadia R; Tay AB; Chan LL; Chan ES Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 40(12):1401-5. PubMed ID: 21862289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of panoramic radiography in determination of neurosensory disturbances related to dental implant placement in posterior mandible. Kütük N; Gönen ZB; Yaşar MT; Demirbaş AE; Alkan A Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):648-52. PubMed ID: 25365650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography. Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery. de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Mandibular Lingual Canal and Anterior Loop Length to Minimize Complications Associated With Anterior Mandibular Surgeries: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Kung CY; Wang YM; Chan CP; Ju YR; Pan WL J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 75(10):2116.e1-2116.e13. PubMed ID: 28704637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proximity of the mandibular canal to the tooth apex. Kovisto T; Ahmad M; Bowles WR J Endod; 2011 Mar; 37(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 21329813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography. Nakayama K; Nonoyama M; Takaki Y; Kagawa T; Yuasa K; Izumi K; Ozeki S; Ikebe T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2587-91. PubMed ID: 19925976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The variable position of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) in the mandibular ramus: a computed tomography (CT) study. Yeh AYE; Finn BP; Jones RHB; Goss AN Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):653-665. PubMed ID: 29353372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults. Park J; Cho HJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study. Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]