255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20236642)
1. Less rigid stable fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone using locked plates with near cortical slots.
Gardner MJ; Nork SE; Huber P; Krieg JC
Injury; 2010 Jun; 41(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 20236642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stiffness modulation of locking plate constructs using near cortical slotted holes: a preliminary study.
Gardner MJ; Nork SE; Huber P; Krieg JC
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Apr; 23(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 19318872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How much do locked screws add to the fixation of "hybrid" plate constructs in osteoporotic bone?
Freeman AL; Tornetta P; Schmidt A; Bechtold J; Ricci W; Fleming M
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Mar; 24(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 20182252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of hybrid plating with locked and nonlocked screws on the strength of locked plating constructs in the osteoporotic diaphysis.
Doornink J; Fitzpatrick DC; Boldhaus S; Madey SM; Bottlang M
J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 20699751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the mechanical properties of locking plates with and without screw hole inserts.
Eichinger JK; Herzog JP; Arrington ED
Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):19. PubMed ID: 21210620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical characteristics of locking and compression plate constructs applied dorsally to distal radius fractures.
Boswell S; McIff TE; Trease CA; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2007; 32(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 17481999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of screw orientation in severely osteoporotic bone: a comparison with locked plating.
Zehnder S; Bledsoe JG; Puryear A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):589-94. PubMed ID: 19464094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.
Fulkerson E; Egol KA; Kubiak EN; Liporace F; Kummer FJ; Koval KJ
J Trauma; 2006 Apr; 60(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16612304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of locking plate radial shaft fixation: unicortical locking fixation versus mixed bicortical and unicortical fixation in a sawbone model.
Roberts JW; Grindel SI; Rebholz B; Wang M
J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 32(7):971-5. PubMed ID: 17826548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proximal humerus fracture rotational stability after fixation using a locking plate or a fixed-angle locked nail: the role of implant stiffness.
Foruria AM; Carrascal MT; Revilla C; Munuera L; Sanchez-Sotelo J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 May; 25(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 20153916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
Wilkens KJ; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 18827592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between locking and non-locking plates for fixation of metacarpal fractures in an animal model.
Ochman S; Doht S; Paletta J; Langer M; Raschke MJ; Meffert RH
J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Apr; 35(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 20299161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can locking screws allow smaller, low-profile plates to achieve comparable stability to larger, standard plates?
Garrigues GE; Glisson RR; Garrigues NW; Richard MJ; Ruch DS
J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jun; 25(6):347-54. PubMed ID: 21577070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study.
Trease C; McIff T; Toby EB
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 30(4):756-63. PubMed ID: 16039369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.
Cullen AB; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of a new system to improve screw fixation in osteoporotic bones.
Yánez A; Carta JA; Garcés G
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jun; 32(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 20227321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
