These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2023736)

  • 1. Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing.
    Katz J; Sommer A; Witt K
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Jan; 98(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 2023736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of computerized perimetric threshold tests as assessed by reliability indices and threshold reproducibility in patients with suspect and manifest glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2000 Oct; 78(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 11037906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective three-year study of response properties of normal subjects and patients during automated perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Nelson-Quigg JM
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Feb; 100(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 8437837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss. The effect of patient reliability.
    Katz J; Sommer A
    Ophthalmology; 1990 Aug; 97(8):1032-7. PubMed ID: 2402414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population.
    Birt CM; Shin DH; Samudrala V; Hughes BA; Kim C; Lee D
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Jul; 104(7):1126-30. PubMed ID: 9224465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the utility of reliability indices for automated visual fields. Testing ocular hypertensives.
    Bickler-Bluth M; Trick GL; Kolker AE; Cooper DG
    Ophthalmology; 1989 May; 96(5):616-9. PubMed ID: 2748118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of reliability with reproducibility of the glaucomatous visual field.
    McMillan TA; Stewart WC; Hunt HH
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Oct; 70(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 1471493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests.
    Katz J; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1252-4. PubMed ID: 3046588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season.
    Junoy Montolio FG; Wesselink C; Gordijn M; Jansonius NM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7010-7. PubMed ID: 22952121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors that influence the prevalence of positive catch trials in glaucoma patients.
    Reynolds M; Stewart WC; Sutherland S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1990; 228(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 2401419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response properties of normal observers and patients during automated perimetry.
    Nelson-Quigg JM; Twelker JD; Johnson CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Nov; 107(11):1612-5. PubMed ID: 2818281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of Mozart's music on the performance of glaucoma patients on automated perimetry.
    Shue B; Chatterjee A; Fudemberg S; Katz LJ; Moster MR; Navarro MJ; Pro M; Schmidt C; Spaeth GL; Stirbu O; Yalcin A; Myers JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7347-9. PubMed ID: 21828156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with standard perimetric threshold testing.
    Felius J; Langerhorst CT; van den Berg TJ; Greve EL
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):221-6. PubMed ID: 1428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Baseline visual field characteristics in the ocular hypertension treatment study.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Cello KE; Edwards M; Kass MA; Gordon MO; Budenz DL; Gaasterland DE; Werner E;
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):432-7. PubMed ID: 11874743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
    Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the accuracy of the visual field index for the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma.
    Talbot R; Goldberg I; Kelly P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 156(6):1272-6. PubMed ID: 24075425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of simultaneous visual field testing.
    Kramer BC; Musch DC; Niziol LM; Weizer JS
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Feb; 119(2):304-7. PubMed ID: 22115714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.