These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2023736)

  • 61. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. An objective evaluation of gaze tracking in Humphrey perimetry and the relation with the reproducibility of visual fields: a pilot study in glaucoma.
    Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):8149-52. PubMed ID: 25389198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Clinical ability of Heidelberg retinal tomograph examination to detect glaucomatous visual field changes.
    Miglior S; Casula M; Guareschi M; Marchetti I; Iester M; Orzalesi N
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Sep; 108(9):1621-7. PubMed ID: 11535460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Progression of visual field in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma - ProgF study 1.
    Aptel F; Aryal-Charles N; Giraud JM; El Chehab H; Delbarre M; Chiquet C; Romanet JP; Renard JP
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 93(8):e615-20. PubMed ID: 26095771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The Liverpool Delphi evaluation.
    González de la Rosa M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1999 Mar; 237(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 10090591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Prea SM; Kong YXG; Mehta A; He M; Crowston JG; Gupta V; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 190():9-16. PubMed ID: 29550190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Pattern electroretinogram and automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Neoh C; Kaye SB; Brown M; Ansons AM; Wishart P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 May; 78(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 8025069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Duration of automated suprathreshold vs quantitative threshold field examination. Impact of age and ocular status.
    Kosoko O; Sommer A; Auer C
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Mar; 104(3):398-401. PubMed ID: 3954641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Accuracy of glaucoma detection with frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Trible JR; Schultz RO; Robinson JC; Rothe TL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jun; 129(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 10926982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shimizu K
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25563. PubMed ID: 27149561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S; Stürmer J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients.
    Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 12566014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Can Visual Field Progression be Predicted by Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopic Imaging of the Optic Nerve Head in Glaucoma? (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).
    Danias J; Serle J
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2015; 113():T4. PubMed ID: 26549913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2201-4. PubMed ID: 10892863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 8489448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. [Usefulness of gaze tracking during perimetry in glaucomatous eyes].
    Kunimatsu S; Suzuki Y; Shirato S; Araie M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Oct; 103(10):748-53. PubMed ID: 10554550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Compass fundus automated perimetry.
    Fogagnolo P; Digiuni M; Montesano G; Rui C; Morales M; Rossetti L
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):481-490. PubMed ID: 29564933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Recognizing glaucomatous field loss with the Humphrey STATPAC.
    Enger C; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Oct; 105(10):1355-7. PubMed ID: 3662906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.