BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2023753)

  • 1. Graft survival in four common groups of patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty.
    Price FW; Whitson WE; Marks RG
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Mar; 98(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 2023753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Progression of visual acuity after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Price FW; Whitson WE; Marks RG
    Ophthalmology; 1991 Aug; 98(8):1177-85. PubMed ID: 1923353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical indications for and procedures associated with penetrating keratoplasty, 1983-1988.
    Brady SE; Rapuano CJ; Arentsen JJ; Cohen EJ; Laibson PR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 Aug; 108(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 2667369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty: 1980-1988.
    Lindquist TD; McGlothan JS; Rotkis WM; Chandler JW
    Cornea; 1991 May; 10(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 2055026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Thompson RW; Price MO; Bowers PJ; Price FW
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Jul; 110(7):1396-402. PubMed ID: 12867398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Keratoplasty of pseudophakic eyes with posterior chamber lenses in Fuchs' dystrophy and secondary bullous keratopathy. Long-term outcome].
    Müller M; Meyer HJ; Meyer C
    Ophthalmologe; 1997 Apr; 94(4):282-4. PubMed ID: 9229497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pseudophakic keratoplasty].
    Freyler H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Feb; 188(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 3520118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Penetrating keratoplasty: changing indications, 1947 to 1978.
    Smith RE; McDonald HR; Nesburn AB; Minckler DS
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Jul; 98(7):1226-9. PubMed ID: 6994703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penetrating keratoplasty 1981-1988: clinical indications and pathologic findings.
    Mamalis N; Craig MT; Coulter VL; Lundergan MK; Olson RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1991 Mar; 17(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 2040973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual results after penetrating keratoplasty for aphakic bullous keratopathy and Fuchs' dystrophy.
    Olson RJ; Waltman SR; Mattingly TP; Kaufman HE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Dec; 88(6):1000-4. PubMed ID: 391046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal grafts for endothelial decompensation: the influence of intraocular lenses on corneal graft survival.
    Völker-Dieben HJ; Kok-van Alphen CC; de Lange P
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1984 Jun; 62(3):432-44. PubMed ID: 6380202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential Survival of Penetrating and Lamellar Transplants in Management of Failed Corneal Grafts.
    Aboshiha J; Jones MNA; Hopkinson CL; Larkin DFP
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 136(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 29931227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results after penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.
    Pineros O; Cohen EJ; Rapuano CJ; Laibson PR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1996 Jan; 114(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 8540845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty.
    Haamann P; Jensen OM; Schmidt P
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Aug; 72(4):443-6. PubMed ID: 7825409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty.
    Mamalis N; Anderson CW; Kreisler KR; Lundergan MK; Olson RJ
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Oct; 110(10):1409-11. PubMed ID: 1417539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Chronic endothelial cell loss of the graft after penetrating keratoplasty: influence of endothelial cell migration from graft to host].
    Reinhard T; Böhringer D; Hüschen D; Sundmacher R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Jun; 219(6):410-6. PubMed ID: 12136435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing Trends in Penetrating Keratoplasty Indications between 2011 and 2018 - Histopathology of 2123 Corneal Buttons in a Single Center in Germany.
    Pluzsik MT; Seitz B; Flockerzi FA; Langenbucher A; Tóth G; Bohle RM; Szentmáry N
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Oct; 45(10):1199-1204. PubMed ID: 32114836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term follow-up of intraocular pressure after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus and Fuchs' dystrophy: comparison of mechanical and Excimer laser trephination.
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Nguyen NX; Küchle M; Naumann GO
    Cornea; 2002 May; 21(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 11973385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Penetrating keratoplasty: outcomes from a corneal unit compared to national data.
    Beckingsale P; Mavrikakis I; Al-Yousuf N; Mavrikakis E; Daya SM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jun; 90(6):728-31. PubMed ID: 16714264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study.
    Coster DJ; Lowe MT; Keane MC; Williams KA;
    Ophthalmology; 2014 May; 121(5):979-87. PubMed ID: 24491643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.